Re: [dbound] On a path to closing

Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B231293D8 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUdHOgdYO5Pe for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D481294F6 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f82so21750895wmf.1 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CLOuDaj7o/fAzORh8NR6jHMVrquZWacNrTDMFLb2KKc=; b=O/alJXTbbam2EFTK9U7MDvEg8zOXwgMnLXhUnd+DJxaz0ajHWP3J9uba6MQk4yUPTD tRwfwRXm0nMoV/XWbwjRCGtzVbyNXgtm4KoNX8Z/Usf6OWwD11PI5KjEx3MP//QN+OOC bSj6sManaFf5eWUyJhwQbO2v/kaEBf+mwRUMc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CLOuDaj7o/fAzORh8NR6jHMVrquZWacNrTDMFLb2KKc=; b=QA8HV73FOYlbkd0hIsHCO5mHb/d6Fvd0vZ/JjPoWspQ7EqHW8frqLxIMGfORKXw9R5 N24mhi5nK9RPzMEcYWWrC838He+ptmduLYXnqrku3aQW7Onyw9If6Bk+zGLFnHWCWPXv z6w+XY3A9Nkr0Kaeg4CUPBIwib49OraBnadMz1xV4KCVkich5zq7E0P8urSH8oCPjJhI ScAi5OiuEII57k0aMwx+Pd2mKnTIHzCsfqpfIxNUDNrEedZzmkAWo4ao25YcwhoSdJKr yvSAdDDA7d4QBpCBP7CxLDtrUNjhux/04qN2WFzeCx7vMGqc6Qmvu7zotZvmuvn4xzUU uI7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdRj5swwSGLBoz0KmZzpST9meSJe1BlQWw1Qjh5zEgsvzXwZTOhwCLbXWWv5RZZzsn9fmXeCZ036d5IbQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.99.27 with SMTP id x27mr9823199lfb.128.1479239090131; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.22.73 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161115125915.GB51667@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20161115125915.GB51667@mx2.yitter.info>
From: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:44:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rB4qxJsOtWUyLWQ0Zp8EuZGahLCQS9C9Jd0PueS1XqrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0ec214816f8405415c30cf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/EHeR63mE5wP-muPgx8uotVaRPsI>
Cc: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dbound] On a path to closing
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:44:53 -0000

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> . . .proposal
> as a way of closing the WG: that we polish off and publish the problem
> statement, in an effort at least to get something written down about
> what issues there are and what distinctions someone might want to
> make.
>

What sort of document artifact would that be? Just an I-D defining the
problem space?


> ...does anyone object to
> pursuing experimental status (assuming we can specify what would
> provide evidence that the experiment worked)?


Seems reasonable. And probably a good basis for keeping this list open to
manage the experiment.

--Kurt