IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dbound] Are there any deliverables?

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 04 July 2014 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01E31A0428 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id quAz4pZCA4Vv for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF56C1A01C8 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 49860 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2014 01:17:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=c2c3.53b60092.k1407; bh=UDi0sGQpJq3n7huUGig/XyuRG9bz1fUnK2SOCwsBJog=; b=m3jxawfbjqcHz4zBB6tJkUMfS4DIxj6GGvEFFkvlZBazJrL8F4b1ffFtxCPlpnjsGc40ItmxgzVRI8uJbzzKYh3PM2Js5U23VAGALGGOkWhGWqgO3Mr84edDSo3omdjGmq7J9S36dpwUzJmvKvPe66wHQgobrI7snk5wbZYkTNAVa1cDRcpQXBjuQdhxB2tnPeeOWFKfN9OXo6ZKaOrLuwdQzQ9t3YhH0IB0amzoeGrz99LvfHTM84QCGqzTrLVo
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=c2c3.53b60092.k1407; bh=UDi0sGQpJq3n7huUGig/XyuRG9bz1fUnK2SOCwsBJog=; b=n49D4faLSy2uRUMaVAkyc8fxnoYj9gQdMY1zdLvVVge62X3cD3d0S6E3WanYTSJ+Qgl994YWOmj5dpprIt78YBWCnDc7UN1uoBsJja64mPqylZwotrGZVnlJbpRKhPtRVpKC+o66cgInw8XyNFSayKRTHQ47KlnUcojLHpxD0nOvvJXluyR0kr9bL0f1ovewqdOqPY5BBvGDMpEhOvAupFtcjuecdVp4LIrXOPIlA9SY5fgltZo7wY6t/Ci98oPQ
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 04 Jul 2014 01:17:06 -0000
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:17:05 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407032116380.12101@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8=R0Y35boZbNASB90gDz3aRMYRMEFQSC9WjytYxhvR2-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140703222002.GA51076@mx1.yitter.info> <20140703225614.12420.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAH8yC8ko1fR8UvetPqtp5YBN0VJtv5SW42qWDjqZnCnbQ8a9dw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407031958190.12101@joyce.lan> <CAH8yC8=R0Y35boZbNASB90gDz3aRMYRMEFQSC9WjytYxhvR2-Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/V9DxRWXpJxiEXdQ84guHNFiyyKY
Cc: dbound@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dbound] Are there any deliverables?
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 01:17:09 -0000

> Also, I'm not sure about this from draft-sullivan-domain-policy-authority-01:
>
>   Historically, policies were sometimes based on the DNS tree.  Early
>   policies made a firm distinction between top-level domains and
>   everything else; but this was also too naive, and later attempts were
>   based on inferences from the domain names themselves.
>
> I think the distinction is going to be one part of the solution. ...

That's just one approach.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email