IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dbound] Are there any deliverables?

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Thu, 03 July 2014 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49E01B2A3B for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kYawOcDaTMVe for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00C071B2A34 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id tp5so889111ieb.6 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=aAWiZkyRxFkDPS/+NwH7nt+6jt/oDxsuMYd2BiFyewo=; b=BchdSB0BghOoH6dsfLHZJTyvd6yztIrRAiGwacnU41LHEl/sAfZglpFasrpD4YZXqH Wvx4vNNJgyDy9ozN4BQoa4JmUAeZ8robbRXCsHbE79zYzWf3Bon6NSQFR2c3AuIgyvCW a5ZG5XMreal6DtNP2uPxqlblD/79eHNX2ku8E=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=aAWiZkyRxFkDPS/+NwH7nt+6jt/oDxsuMYd2BiFyewo=; b=Fo/v2bPY/Y9Hb7r0ikvsHhOJcWp0bd3g1aQJpDdb09RRbWs8UV3AiNT8FAzuwmme7A T/vCQwAqoUkjZQvNP/J2od09Nx/rhXVtuzZKHB7Nq39WfNI+10sA+/6vbjjp0Fx54UoL O4FYa56VH+kYHl+tvE/70fuzRd1w31RsVfPZrvEgxeVTVoqLdMEAh2chJFWJUl2RU/Yx x5p0xQLZ9f9IY2QRkQZ6j1bDQuWQv6mR8NtJFpbl0nc60x9JL+XWOo/RS8iOAZitHCIv F6SoqmHXju2iRK84b+FVTqw3KmbIjxIFz0ZJqEU8wfdED3Gf2ztC37DAVwXo+QgfapOv +mdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTKJla6AxNcljlHLpD5o8IvDcQD82Xib8QFL/bfKRFUNx4d3K5mkWeGmBYkmZea9X65NEu
X-Received: by 10.42.83.7 with SMTP id f7mr5132328icl.65.1404424092427; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walrus.hopcount.ca (24-52-234-221.cable.teksavvy.com. [24.52.234.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm56147371ige.22.2014.07.03.14.48.11 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:48:11 -0400
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: noloader@gmail.com
Message-ID: <etPan.53b5cf9b.6b68079a.38df@walrus.hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8nmsEiqTtWptYM-a650WP=zsJQmV3YgnCXvSRArdmDu8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8nmsEiqTtWptYM-a650WP=zsJQmV3YgnCXvSRArdmDu8w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (237)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/XveHlvtChSai8J0pLCDIie3U45c
Cc: dbound@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dbound] Are there any deliverables?
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:48:14 -0000

Hi Jeffrey,

On 3 July 2014 at 17:41:37, Jeffrey Walton (noloader@gmail.com) wrote:
> Looking through the archive, Dbound appears to be relatively new. Has
> the group produced any deliverables? If so, where are they?
>  
> Sorry to have to ask. I'm facing hostname matching/verification checks
> for X509 certificate (not cookie matching), and I don't want to hack
> up Mozilla's PSL (been here, done that). I'm looking for a more
> disciplined approach this time around.

As I understand it, dbound has held a BOF but is not a working group, and hence has no charter or milestones.

I am aware of some work relating to PSL evolution going on in a couple of quiet corners, but nothing that has yet yielded any public results.

There are a couple of Internet-Drafts that could be used as part of a migration strategy from the currently-maintained PSL to something better in the future, but nobody (to my knowledge) has suggested out loud a migration strategy of any kind.

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sullivan-domain-policy-authority-01
  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-orgboundary-02

I think it would be useful if you could talk more about your particular problem statement, though. If chartered, a future dbound working group will need all the problem statements it can get.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email