IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrouting] DC Routing requirements draft

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 November 2017 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F6713FC5E for <dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOQX-hXRWoCT for <dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF69D13FC60 for <dcrouting@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m72so2682243wmc.1 for <dcrouting@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XzUa8/RWN0SdNV4vIb5mKDeXl+mvJzcZ8f8ZdbeSAVo=; b=PSZTRVZsTJR3PGjwEO8sPl0OH3dQHxGcFuJo9Cc9t3Kj0yPDAgEArxgCn0EDWYaiLZ /3iF2quQbaHtZH1UwkfF6gV0WzXv/quShZsJksOhARpAeYDJLvAung2HyPcvBO1fZRfJ uUm7fOTttqxKIfmy6qPgaX0KKg+cyjJbrdjxwzhGXJJHYxvNCTeB1+GyG0wpeYIRsdVo SfRrtDf8ZLsfQAEwbuNxn3ldm2pFrlMnnxq/geEGXs/nqyRBDIVyDhnEmNopWo8vlIsA dAa7C/CLdrpn4Jp0fmGxN+2aV2nMDMx8nisjPRKAOagARdnu994BaVjgiymMV1hs+GZ+ r5Uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XzUa8/RWN0SdNV4vIb5mKDeXl+mvJzcZ8f8ZdbeSAVo=; b=HNRBU2+HmmZeuvZ9tPLA04/8HN3Gpq0d8pS2HH+Gz4T7q82yc9oDTyTWLGSdRdX7MJ L8K3Nvnf1fRjVELUyGPVNgZTtFVJZ613LOv1MBO2ElWnTtL5Kmy1VnTwr4A99PGP9HF6 mfwVU1e5TvCY1MwKXkJY/TIQ/7Z0cdVcEGbs8vZvOZUz0uhNCJxfApvY2ba+3hXVauwo 8/K0Uk6Hj+6qGerEMZfYGYIhs83YNFhYKwEayyFfL8SsNxJVALj7hGUoT7qEoeSq67ss FemZuK9B/JF3KZjz88EgJysx8FMHNLMF39VCLQZIaUsc/z5faB6x7cch5ctXHr6VBRp9 PLbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXe3GrdsbVRdKMb44GoJvLRV51O/4QZldSehY8s/Qqoc53YwJsS aoDqsiZynR2bUXoMIxhI/IM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RgMP/r/+5v1fpy4XW7l//0fAN0nPrEFSWQpP5/M5F8jJePTc4eHy+Us0s7U4KVdkfeT49uAQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.17.66 with SMTP id 63mr423060wmr.66.1509514295350; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:f:8000:210:2db8:f818:f486:2371? ([2620:f:8000:210:2db8:f818:f486:2371]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q3sm1723126wrd.78.2017.10.31.22.31.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2efpi36zl.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:31:31 +0400
Cc: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "dcrouting@ietf.org" <dcrouting@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <852F82B5-D625-437E-87B2-A81D594BD335@gmail.com>
References: <56F12355-DBF1-47C8-B7F7-C057DC40F1B0@gmail.com> <m2vaiv2jd2.wl-randy@psg.com> <2BD778A9-868D-444B-BCFA-EE060923C64E@gmail.com> <1899221575.91902.1509494163197@mail.yahoo.com> <m2efpi36zl.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrouting/NcpJJ6O6TuyinnFb8_B-ILjO9lQ>
Subject: Re: [Dcrouting] DC Routing requirements draft
X-BeenThere: dcrouting@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Routing in the Data Center: discussions about problems, requirements and potential solutions." <dcrouting.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrouting/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrouting@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 05:31:38 -0000


> On Nov 1, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> But, just in case some people are thinking that enterprises do not
>> have data centers
> 
> i doubt anyone questions that enterprises sometimes have datacenters.
> enterprises sometimes also have printers.  this does not mean
> enterprises *are* printers.

That may be the rub here. I doubt that enterprises that have data centers *are* data centers in either of your minds, any more than enterprises that *have* printers *are* printers. However, in the data centers that enterprises have, they may have specific requirements that don't map well to the likes of Azure or Google, but which are in fact requirements of a class of data centers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email