IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrouting] [Lsvr] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf

Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com> Tue, 02 January 2018 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <keyur@arrcus.com>
X-Original-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA7E124E15; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:49:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netorgft1331857.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHl4g3MrSIkM; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03on0080.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E42124B17; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:49:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=NETORGFT1331857.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-arrcus-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=d+D0hNhb5GAInNnYEcO2Ywx/hbt0q7VyXmZhId3EfiY=; b=hY49DbEfyvWvCA3K2Debp/KPr9dfybp3USxnnvrJVP8FPPQxkQkxkzJEB32szKB2d5K8qNFJt06JHT+OjP4ZtjX46LYKZ36UyZMG1CNdAQcDU6u09NY8GP/D7yDjrChuMiV7OEf9zvKJbP8DS45LZ3Vq6sa0rgiuKsFSRus9AXY=
Received: from CY4PR18MB1127.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.173.184.14) by CY4PR18MB1127.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.173.184.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.366.8; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:49:07 +0000
Received: from CY4PR18MB1127.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.184.14]) by CY4PR18MB1127.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.184.14]) with mapi id 15.20.0366.007; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:49:07 +0000
From: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, "dcrouting@ietf.org" <dcrouting@ietf.org>
CC: "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsvr] [Dcrouting] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf
Thread-Index: AQHTg/H8Y7k3PUiZ40+n21S43R09BQ==
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:49:07 +0000
Message-ID: <0DB89F21-8E32-46A7-A2B7-B79977948455@arrcus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=keyur@arrcus.com;
x-originating-ip: [75.8.210.205]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY4PR18MB1127; 6:N2n89Yig7AQ4s21ulX5YeseXJgeMaULnFvCM+7Nc0bNyvIvFcWS6xi86GNzDnH+ZwNflj4XnGkrjHUl2BAAEGk1hzLJ27Ipo485atPYyb7Fev7Oh/vh3UgOXi8CVsk9L/eo6xC+zcyYHzf+Q0g/cJOH9JbAR9mX0iB8oCVtmgZxVuDb948WWdVyvzdRt8aUsuz+Wz+unVCIhXPEC6zehwUmuRPKuWD1R2g5eNz6++anB0SJ70d+7IOx3iwy5neFL8fJe97enxTShYIexugAPIIgoeyIgLPtfPkYNQJti1CgkkhcdZkZb8cF5scw7VOtEBvlYLRRqc+6fDldBkHW/YxbTqI1LXXJEbN3vfJ8BDdBaOBRR5AQmkNF+YMY/ZqTt; 5:zz6Qmnniay3k5rgAic8iCatVIfumoZfXCihW6lDF7mXQsY8eqnjjMSgyXw2qac3HXoIooSdVS9AE4D2KgTPuAx/kFlXbqAQU7vKO6jfuQp5uTKe2E2v1/AeQ8McahsT0OkRCu4PLK9Kab5tr4FsXH+gWzzCqBCrKCzSIMMw3JG8=; 24:ykMpVjJ/RfP/x5mzlCPdJ0qJoBDimysL1CDRdgUYEmUBogvciWjEz8qtDlgcqlG+1PnM+ZBcM4om/QFWKjSLsjoV6MasWSwW502akm62Ddo=; 7:Ycy+GfE2p0oHHNz4cDIt8LFzkspusou07++gu1DJcinm1Buv7+ItBMX9aOoSGvAf+tnLPLyqTcvSIOvnqj7IJDnVTmwhORUOvNCBXhQyCWCPKBGHUf/7kFiMD65A2E5MHv4/WPmJnmDTBt/Hu8mNOAARAKWDUH39dIVU/357RjK3RtmpVK+zHMlk+xaBF0lkuA7C2N1eYkPPsr2UcxmU8fL28JKke7I2+ark7V/BqXIhVxwmt5ENfFHuRxiC6qpf
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: dfd2ecff-b857-4f58-eb2c-08d552091f53
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060); SRVR:CY4PR18MB1127;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR18MB1127:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR18MB1127FC8DDB3ECF066D5098AEC1190@CY4PR18MB1127.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(50582790962513)(95692535739014)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231023)(944501075)(6041268)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(2016111802025)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:CY4PR18MB1127; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:CY4PR18MB1127;
x-forefront-prvs: 0540846A1D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(366004)(39830400003)(396003)(376002)(39380400002)(189003)(199004)(24454002)(106356001)(86362001)(105586002)(33656002)(8936002)(5660300001)(81156014)(36756003)(83716003)(230783001)(2906002)(8676002)(81166006)(7736002)(82746002)(6116002)(14454004)(68736007)(3846002)(97736004)(99286004)(6512007)(6306002)(54896002)(236005)(4326008)(39060400002)(6246003)(102836004)(77096006)(6486002)(25786009)(316002)(53936002)(6436002)(53546011)(6506007)(229853002)(3280700002)(2900100001)(478600001)(2501003)(110136005)(66066001)(3660700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR18MB1127; H:CY4PR18MB1127.namprd18.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: arrcus.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: btViPaO42myFMQsgQ1APReP8OV4kXAjykdbn8B46xlzpAKKXzoby7Dj5Ox7bxZci6HucjbE3pNEiqUDS7OSGAg==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0DB89F218E3246A7A2B7B79977948455arrcuscom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: arrcus.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dfd2ecff-b857-4f58-eb2c-08d552091f53
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jan 2018 17:49:07.4694 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 697b3529-5c2b-40cf-a019-193eb78f6820
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR18MB1127
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrouting/RrrgeRNdctmpdCv5bJBD3SmYbtQ>
Subject: Re: [Dcrouting] [Lsvr] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf
X-BeenThere: dcrouting@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Routing in the Data Center: discussions about problems, requirements and potential solutions." <dcrouting.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrouting/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrouting@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:49:13 -0000

+1 to what Acee said.

Furthermore, we could chose to consider such an interaction as a matter of local policy (implementation specific).

Regards,
Keyur


From: Lsvr <lsvr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 9:29 AM
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, "dcrouting@ietf.org" <dcrouting@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] [Dcrouting] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf

Used as an underlay, BGP SPF just works. What needs to be defined are the rules when the same prefix is advertised in both address families.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Dcrouting <dcrouting-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:dcrouting-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, December 22, 2017 at 9:20 AM
To: Xiaohu Xu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com<mailto:xuxiaohu@huawei.com>>, "dcrouting@ietf.org<mailto:dcrouting@ietf.org>" <dcrouting@ietf.org<mailto:dcrouting@ietf.org>>
Cc: "lsvr@ietf.org<mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>" <lsvr@ietf.org<mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Dcrouting] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf

On December 22, 2017 at 3:27:24 AM, Xuxiaohu (xuxiaohu@huawei.com<mailto:xuxiaohu@huawei.com>) wrote:

Xiaohu:

Hi!

I wonder whether it's worthwhile to consider the coexistence of the traditional BGP-DV protocol and the BGP-SPF protocol on a given node. If so...

Yes, I think so.

That (coexistence with/separation from traditional BGP) is one of the pieces that I expect to see in a forthcoming proposed charter for lsvr — please subscribe to that list (cc’d here) and contribute your comments and ideas there. :-)

Thanks!!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email