IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrouting] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrouting@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADFD12EAB2; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:20:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qx6lcPHxffMS; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A266F12EAB0; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j14so7810099oih.3; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J26oboSX92LOULpK7z5RL4Gki/nPOR2P6CtTlrnQHR8=; b=cckKcpfNb3iEN4VjpZbii2TIUuSnoMgWnlnbAPSwC4UwS36WhDj3POzTGcFrsvKNlA SiZib56YPoRms43RiDmx4m9NQSQfoxT6t7zL2BwPyHlRAUZVc6QIG7AzGXRUC1G3hHWn fipuuduAgO+OOSe4XHAX795DPRl+VROrs94BwKDVdTuv8Y1xP3QF/w/akFHcl3+2Ymyt 7XjmBDQaIB7G/W3/KJMIauN3wvBfge9GBWoYrIj+Fxh5XM+1Ftj/q8n72t2XePFMIGA0 ngoMUIq0dXhOhvhGSrF30d4f1XMBLCMs+YmnwOXQZawd/QSuqJBiVRjMQ0UqGMLv+X98 HwTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J26oboSX92LOULpK7z5RL4Gki/nPOR2P6CtTlrnQHR8=; b=ge9WUL/dZCM5YjFkqFzJ0Ipi52VjfmtKDKUbUSRwdYpNqr4GA7Bre9l9Y2t3mkNIVG myTDEF9x+S88wcLFcDyb3QRGBsILaOM2nRVWsVr3w1pfPPfGXaOf9bbbg9MM3SNgaLRZ 568R+4n/Asb5FDntnS/kn1pPJlna0vr7ZIegpKWH57lGzrD9qgES1RISR1yFjiC0AHn4 /6TCEnmMMTSV0IgBbZL4mKu1tOQddRNTR4jp1vSqamwsU1NJX4Ttz2SfzWO2qSVYqX2g ND1HtxeNa7gif47aCzEIsFszXuCeJV+qdpXzrkqvhNb+393uJCu2ibrJLpg4T+vUXQJD g0Gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJuGUnQ7iG6sVieprxJBxG6r9cF2pTOmzkr8OdmhIlakl0FhBp0 x5ol/vuOrgmYYaWl9jqQMvUA/nOsoewrbr5e9oo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouiwDO8Dh1wFtkb2zyQmnO7itru3e0JHi40HQBuO6JkOAtM1Y5VPV+lt+hjKkJ1T2/pX5Ke3nGSdB5JNUlipWU=
X-Received: by 10.202.182.196 with SMTP id g187mr10885207oif.216.1513952422038; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:20:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:20:21 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE304A7141@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE304A7141@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (467)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:20:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESsw65Ock+AYPCmJWT49da-o6eF=X=_d=T8RoSEACU76Mrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, "dcrouting@ietf.org" <dcrouting@ietf.org>
Cc: lsvr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cee705294300560ee84b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrouting/W6WXGP88j6Kpuh1JBHo4oc4CSZc>
Subject: Re: [Dcrouting] A comment on draft-keyupate-idr-bgp-spf
X-BeenThere: dcrouting@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Routing in the Data Center: discussions about problems, requirements and potential solutions." <dcrouting.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrouting/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrouting@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrouting>, <mailto:dcrouting-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:20:24 -0000

On December 22, 2017 at 3:27:24 AM, Xuxiaohu (xuxiaohu@huawei.com) wrote:

Xiaohu:

Hi!

I wonder whether it's worthwhile to consider the coexistence of the
traditional BGP-DV protocol and the BGP-SPF protocol on a given node. If
so...

Yes, I think so.

That (coexistence with/separation from traditional BGP) is one of the
pieces that I expect to see in a forthcoming proposed charter for lsvr —
please subscribe to that list (cc’d here) and contribute your comments and
ideas there. :-)

Thanks!!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email