Re: [Dcrup] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04: (with COMMENT)

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 25 October 2017 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4056D13A344 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=kitterman.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZ6y13wypVeL for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [IPv6:2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E81A13A1FA for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.120.45.156] (mobile-166-170-50-249.mycingular.net [166.170.50.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30DCDC4025F; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:11:57 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2001409; t=1508890318; bh=Fr4b2AA5sY2EL1YBhWxAEKalHh6YI9CnlZu+yPGSUNc=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From:From; b=yfX+6QNOktdFfUrb1PX/vEE4urRHeBEh9FtfXJ3pdRXdsXe74TYaqn6T3F3yohQtP Ml1NoMKuWGKjlVkWL4KRZRd6iF5Ajk+FFqw2kGc2aFvHo71GTkfEKZRUgkU7ip0lj1 bJNb985P9JiCvDxCKXcPYFSLGwtvvTPMUpVYy3IE=
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:11:53 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY6ArUVmGnuTg4ar4A5LiqNh3+mmssVkfMpQmUoHZyT5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150656461384.13748.13197533071257342162.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbN0O5zenpNtR3YA=v-Tqs5MpF-GbRdDmJB2WMa6eD5YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1rJ0uR+oHu+rxUVEykg-6YSVLU9z27DMUfoAqWccgWUFA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY6ArUVmGnuTg4ar4A5LiqNh3+mmssVkfMpQmUoHZyT5g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: dcrup@ietf.org
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <3193DFB2-23F1-4E7C-BFB9-2EB4DC6B530A@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/CalivNoVNVkIYgDFN_cSmmz6uoI>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:12:01 -0000


On October 24, 2017 12:55:48 PM PDT, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy
><superuser@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I see Ben's point, and "MUST be able to..." sounds reasonable to me.
> I
>>> think this also addresses Jari's GEN-ART point (to which Mirja
>alluded),
>>> and his "MUST implement" suggestion also seems reasonable to me.
>>>
>>> What does the WG prefer?
>>>
>>
>> "MUST be able to" seems to capture the intent.
>>
>
>I concur (as an individual).
>
>And as chair, I'd say this small issue probably has consensus, so
>Scott,
>please make this tweak and resubmit (modulo the other post-IESG thread)
>and
>then Alexey can send it on its way.
>
>-MSK

Will do once I know what to put in for the other thread.

Scott K