IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 20 August 2017 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A34B13209C for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 10:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXRU8rqUW14K for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 10:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68D41241FC for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 10:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6034 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2017 17:47:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 20 Aug 2017 17:47:31 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 17:47:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20170820174709.4697.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Cc: sklist@kitterman.com
In-Reply-To: <1577948.qipkle3Fep@kitterma-e6430>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/SEO4FvOM5RcYjcY7h3353Zxyhs0>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 17:47:35 -0000

In article <1577948.qipkle3Fep@kitterma-e6430> you write:
>We're within a few hours of the week being up and the rate of additional 
>commentary has fallen to nil, so I took a crack at updating based on the last 
>call comments.  I'm attaching an rfcdiff of what I would propose as a post-LC 
>-04, but won't upload it until I get some direction.

Looks fine to me.  I don't know whether the IANA change should move
SHA-1 to "obsolete" or "historic", but IANA can presumably give advice
about what the practice has been.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email