IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sun, 20 August 2017 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2831321EC for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 11:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pF_kXGkWQPRu for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout03.controlledmail.com (mailout03.controlledmail.com [208.43.65.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD391321C0 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.195.72] (unknown [65.246.72.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout03.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAA86C402C8; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 13:00:24 -0500 (CDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1503252024; bh=2apafrBUHYk8rQtIrYGyQ1t8WcerdUcX6mgmqGFoecs=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From:From; b=lW3Rrw9gYQ9/wcfXiKoojOGZSWZDMTCvedKAmtJVGSsoqrsF3Jv5BGuUObU9bRhtH ZtGS2372ImLKnzRs27WxpMt7uQ1jduAMaqsyESgJoQ3a4/D9uKncupZHPCAfS0/qFL R91bddQJLHf7rzSnihEpgFNj2WWC/iapaH2e7a6k=
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 18:00:18 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20170820174709.4697.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20170820174709.4697.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: dcrup@ietf.org
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Message-ID: <1FBE750D-6EB1-47F9-B308-02A37FE2B6C8@kitterman.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/tx3QuRraPNPciVr3lRa4l5P0Z9c>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] FW: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 18:00:28 -0000


On August 20, 2017 1:47:09 PM EDT, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>In article <1577948.qipkle3Fep@kitterma-e6430> you write:
>>We're within a few hours of the week being up and the rate of
>additional 
>>commentary has fallen to nil, so I took a crack at updating based on
>the last 
>>call comments.  I'm attaching an rfcdiff of what I would propose as a
>post-LC 
>>-04, but won't upload it until I get some direction.
>
>Looks fine to me.  I don't know whether the IANA change should move
>SHA-1 to "obsolete" or "historic", but IANA can presumably give advice
>about what the practice has been.

Thanks. I'm not sure either, so I left it alone.  Since we aren't removing it from the protocol definition anymore, I think obsolete works with MUST NOT/MUST NOT better than historic, but whatever IANA suggests, as you said.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email