IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 19 December 2017 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDB2126E3A for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtJ3JLIoHlot for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1139127010 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id w10so22245359qtb.10 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Hgz6hexXy+yF/knfPyv0N5erXvskJbnKirQ0TtSDBRE=; b=BLhDeiYxQrQtgi7UmV3WFI766lr1FDnlki1L4JE0funVc9EkjkLN6ZvJjW/LEgylay bzNp3nGlTdAs5zLnOicLWZDIuowbzp1ZI1hKpbe/1k5kzRHyVJNAZMGZOQ34zYz/hY31 sXnTwcSGwat/KTr9dVovG81KNIkVVq4uNVwYaQ09PbQ3/PLp5DfYsq2K8NtLUrsl33D7 ijsnG7A1FCn6M0880p9Yz2MrRzTn4bcfpq10DmaeYun5q9kg7VYn/5Kaex59RoTRqOhv kpO70VaaDfEHhz8Oxmmg3zIDMoAULmFiDlu20WUMAVlk7R8oqCeAAEiDYaU9ZD5nVXI8 6lHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Hgz6hexXy+yF/knfPyv0N5erXvskJbnKirQ0TtSDBRE=; b=UfhOWSlJl41gm+QWVRFohoE++tWi2PWtwFe8J3DtZbWDCLtubf4pJzkS0tyMWdLABp LfUIxA46H8TjSz0OE2S9U+lMhk2Ypaqr0IIwCIWCUzSR6xwL6G1ciGpDAora/54X6Tu+ +g0yv5grnQiDg2F0fiVrf3PP9RR4q/j72PYmDT6euo8ZJ7Gwa9SyaaxY9lDIufsUAgtp 9YDHmEHWITO1k+ElClZ36euocYQKRVE/s8+F8bHAaTtBWodNzJmxaBa0HG/wtx6V8auI XOpOTEJ8PfdfoIc6VWdoeh8V2JJBb/Ccu/VBiv9/fvOWd1Y6h2cSsSz7vrwmyf8GV5hS Tajg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKurfVFL5L5myMb11lvh/IiOCHKlBvcqeRT2V6YpkYNd5lPVKhr C8bS4HVgOn9CR6dr5Qwi8X0wPVanaY2qnvFJX+hOSA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovC1JaiqeCkRLHz9XrsG4o9MyPouKea/28NCVkYIxCiBPEgnurj04tbUvrN5f2ZKqK+E5rJWR1zl5TJhulTKZU=
X-Received: by 10.200.37.3 with SMTP id 3mr2272992qtm.21.1513643215636; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.33.1 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5898513.HCQYKTO1iX@kitterma-e6430>
References: <CAL0qLwb_WHM_e2odpc6gL2birKvVCKGpTpnW0oO_OUqWwFuo_g@mail.gmail.com> <2270822.kPNmBh82Ph@kitterma-e6430> <CAOZAAfOuk1NVQ8r8QRbQt6=WwGwk70dk1-m=5JhNhmoVgHykxQ@mail.gmail.com> <5898513.HCQYKTO1iX@kitterma-e6430>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:26:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY16ytGUFhg1+PWRFE013Nn_MuFDFmv+j9PziD3sg7vXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140333e2f4d9a0560a686a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/qJJizt5i1k64XeBBjQ3qv2XTARs>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:26:59 -0000

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> On Monday, December 18, 2017 12:28:36 PM Seth Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > That's what the reference to RFC6376] Section 3.9 does.
> >
> > Yes, that was what my nit was about. Right now, following the reference
> you
> > still need to infer that PERMFAIL is the appropriate response, and the
> > question was if it needs to be explicitly stated in conjunction with the
> > reference. "No" is a perfectly acceptable response.
>
> OK.  That's copy/pasted from the -update draft that's been through IETF
> last
> call/IESG approval already, so I'd go with "No" then.
>

This document has been through neither of those processes yet.  Are you
thinking of the usage document?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email