IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dd] Charter - objectives and scope

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2024 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D305FC14F6A3 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4NvL4R_ZZpQU for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C37C14F69E for <dd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-690c43c5b5aso10468386d6.1 for <dd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711078076; x=1711682876; darn=ietf.org; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Er4OZ34FWoBFwLw7DkwXH9d2d8nBC/wvwRm1RC8g17k=; b=l8iIkchq1mlDVPuAxHKWV5sQ/pjG/tjTNBPAV6FzXfDukwpIiH++F4Jv1cA6Vmsp8O Z8//6cM8KQKBIo8Zq9H1yVOoisONqaL059I2XiHc6hh3LkJ7V921t+t9UvafoAK90OdS emEdfrrAf5jCwUpYQNmJZs8pPPBdWk55wmdtKh/MR+8tr47QKWg3wBY67OYwSgf0DYfO ybWMHs2WciRLH5UTfDxwrxfeV1c6zUPnjDmk4IhqrdWW7d0nNXyMdAmSVmdfl6fSzu9T I7y0MUaGud6Gcr7BWNe80N5FCjQbEIZwgk4R84D4kkgczX2IW9GajaHy+y/2qwxT40pw zBAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711078076; x=1711682876; h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Er4OZ34FWoBFwLw7DkwXH9d2d8nBC/wvwRm1RC8g17k=; b=K4B2WuyIXC1c0XPhwZ0a03BYzzYLGA6O5h0F4BROWmsogQJY2Do5zyLSuPftwoRtnh RV4kClROozriPqmWAJJ7lFbCVKVJ8L4NoWoNF/yNWGyU+R7ZAygynggvjflx/vt5y2ot AGaApgWNI+W/mbSBz+yjSSKmoNtUjtVWubq4tXQI3/rJuTB8RQbUB8iEF880YG5DLMRG EYEyTHBZflkaByG72eTrAgO8abMWYCmUMIdneCrRU8ajtv6mgmED0fWvGW/KwnpMP/Xk /JfR0bLrGm0TKb/yxSqBcSuuu2BgHw3QC9y2GDdceiTbxNP6aqk5lE6CkZvwcHPuA3tQ neNg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVOUf4VSRsU41ou96L10akFokZPKpK0D8nKgRWNENUvfdSV4A4VsskrGjJynlVjfrjfkQr5tt9E8Vm5rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyTjJ1z+2Ng+rg7Pvbz33Zbgd+KQJiFy98jAXLmRYG+5Btoc+fd rfSMvhZYhC+vfd/Bc/bsVWl/QCPsEOCdvSRuGuDwrW7uTvB5L0yR3Q9gMqWq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG4bkITVIfYqldb5naJeymYBXAS+hXF0gcF9ouq2lBpsdxFhLG5wBDUHVx2nbXkKilbkI7yng==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d45:b0:690:c36d:f449 with SMTP id 5-20020a0562140d4500b00690c36df449mr1036587qvr.60.1711078076409; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([173.81.18.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jy8-20020a0562142b4800b00696147f229fsm88361qvb.83.2024.03.21.20.27.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:27:44 -0400
Message-Id: <D8E5BD0D-BB3E-4F7A-B820-29C389468A79@gmail.com>
References: <F7F1DAA4-A236-4C35-85C8-F283ECA8DB80@rfc1035.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, Ed Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>, dd@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F7F1DAA4-A236-4C35-85C8-F283ECA8DB80@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21E236)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/5W2kVLqr-zCL6mZKROcAlENNgks>
Subject: Re: [dd] Charter - objectives and scope
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 03:27:57 -0000

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 21, 2024, at 23:24, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:



> On 22 Mar 2024, at 02:12, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:
> 
> The way I phrased it in the updated charter was the requirement for including  Operational and Deployment considerations.  IE, we don't say positive or negative just that potential issues should be documented.  Do people find this insufficient?

How about “The WG will carry out an operational impact assessment” or something like that?


I’m good with that 

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email