Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency
Debasis Dalapati <deb@tci.bell-atl.com> Fri, 21 August 1992 19:03 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id ab05013; 21 Aug 92 15:03 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05009; 21 Aug 92 15:03 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14263; 21 Aug 92 15:05 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA27129; Fri, 21 Aug 92 12:03:59 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA21774; Fri, 21 Aug 92 11:53:07 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA21770; Fri, 21 Aug 92 11:53:07 -0700
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA26520; Fri, 21 Aug 92 11:53:06 -0700
Received: by bagate.BELL-ATL.COM (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.29)id <m0mLe89-0000gnC@bagate.BELL-ATL.COM>; Fri, 21 Aug 92 14:54 EDT
Received: by tci.bell-atl.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA11001; Fri, 21 Aug 92 15:00:28 EDT
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 15:00:28 -0400
From: Debasis Dalapati <deb@tci.bell-atl.com>
Message-Id: <9208211900.AA11001@tci.bell-atl.com>
To: phiv-mib@pa.dec.com
Subject: Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency
>saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com (jon saperia) wrote: > >Is this what John/Art are suggesting: > > > phivAdjTable OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PhivAdjEntry > ACCESS not-accessible > STATUS mandatory > DESCRIPTION > "The Adjacency Table." > ::= { adjacency 1 } > > phivAdjEntry OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX PhivAdjEntry > ACCESS not-accessible > STATUS mandatory > DESCRIPTION > "There is one entry in the table for each adjacency." >-----> INDEX { phivAdjCircuitIndex, phivAdjNodeAddr } > ::= { phivAdjTable 1 } > > > [ stuff deleted ] > Jon, I am suggesting just to change the line "INDEX { phivAdjCircuitIndex }" to "INDEX { phivAdjCircuitIndex, phivAdjNodeAddr }". Nothing else needs to be changed in the phivAdjEntry object. phivAdjCircuitIndex remains as it is now. debasis
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Debasis Dalapati
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Debasis Dalapati
- DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency John A. Shriver
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Art Berggreen
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Debasis Dalapati
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency --the fi… saperia
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency saperia
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Phil Budne
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency saperia
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency David Perkins