[Detnet] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-yang-19: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 14 February 2024 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26615C15154D; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:10:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-yang@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, janos.farkas@ericsson.com, janos.farkas@ericsson.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.5.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Message-ID: <170794142013.28018.15909215792815231866@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:10:20 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/0InG2EunR2YtjS6OvxRGCQ9PIrU>
Subject: [Detnet] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-yang-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:10:20 -0000

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-yang-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have no comments, exept a note to Erik Kline's ballot comment :)

IPsec SPI is defined in RFC 4303:

   The set of SPI values in the range 1 through 255 are reserved by the
   Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) for future use; a reserved
   SPI value will not normally be assigned by IANA unless the use of the
   assigned SPI value is specified in an RFC.  The SPI value of zero (0)
   is reserved for local, implementation-specific use and MUST NOT be
   sent on the wire.

So the definition is probably right. While right now there is no valid SPI < 256,
and some implementations use it to refer to internal things, in theory these
could appear in the future.