IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] New version of draft-ietf-detnet-raw-industrial-req

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 08 February 2024 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F829C14F61C for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:45:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5x-VJDktyWL for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:45:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F9EC14F60D for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-511490772f6so2478544e87.2 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 08:44:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; t=1707410695; x=1708015495; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5OYOekaMi7wU0LamBwRrI5v1afFkVVeXqd0ncVZddQo=; b=lqsrCqjRgalm2lBng7cO0uFOHUHWxSBNLLpGHRqhOKg3ZigyQTnc6+mI7Oda0Eik7g /FqpxOvT+vlDIMPmNQDjUCuQYLoTEqT0Sj8JzXBB48ZfdXAoW4rC2iJH44f3RHvFyb1Y kj2F0fyQF4MnzBjNRmBXhTfipG6+SiIEu+Vb8FFwz9WG8jeO4XFvOiWjZ6TuId5fzpaL 2nWzyDtPz21rcNkO/PPyTuG4JyEfg5uniduGAv6oLcxB+1+NuMJDe4uUkN4HxjXbyNX8 +qsmoAXO6MABVpyYkPVWfZqM/L6iGZOX20ir5SK6ZiHIaYTAckgI48pPil+MgAknbe25 kmHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707410695; x=1708015495; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5OYOekaMi7wU0LamBwRrI5v1afFkVVeXqd0ncVZddQo=; b=HCg/iCMr+xYNPIVRX61tPktyo09x+/t1DkecSocm0a2IKmrwLjjkMQVjQ+d1TGb/q7 dJDNuc6l6ovwjznx95s5tJUYXLsTpVmtZGjCeGFfIDYoFNxh+d00Q7VCZ1NrBDtAMR5N w4sVeyt1TyfFnh1v5Ix/CgkOXD3iCI1OxIfsFsWfZW7TLyiQzk/q3L8+nbwJYNgUAYNB zXTUAuHoceXS2S2OjjeHrzKSFusPkZObBWvK5Fagd5YnGxreTb50DLyx0uzBuRdiYI4A R1d2oJuGESLRvpDhMLphwHoeZNNAIoDn2noKQvSoPc+Gtjg3ocWPqCKHz7o200us68rn kodQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/jcE26CoQFxvoddoaqu867jgcYrUxS1MqoNu717embP+WXstF CtHq3388kOAqlFC68zl1xP7Bmyn+SDJYCHDZSgwMuOYXefcCSlE61qdc3JdiS6GD95oPKTqrLgH G7ShPaNyzoUM3DNTW0LoI00hL2OCj1qQbhiiAjXSIgwAEvujd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETAF32MuSlfmFZX/FmzgvYFN6x5Wwl9fRZiMUmUo2SLJM7tnm5SHDHvMyiEhrfhP1F/nsfj42tHV8kNGJxgs0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e2a:b0:511:2e97:add2 with SMTP id i42-20020a0565123e2a00b005112e97add2mr8428421lfv.66.1707410695434; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 08:44:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALypLp-k_wy+TV8j39VjLiYMXthwVAVpMrAMWKat4oA5NeuaqA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+8ZkcR=zDJrd2E0VWuKjmwS_nQ+shOnbs8tWhA0nbhwbuOqWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+8ZkcR=zDJrd2E0VWuKjmwS_nQ+shOnbs8tWhA0nbhwbuOqWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 17:44:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CALypLp-WohqztPi+o2PpZLKn5PQKwo1qZvJ65OpTS2Ubs_bNjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jinoo Joung <jjoung@smu.ac.kr>
Cc: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd22640610e187fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/3M7H_SpIxqOIPguA02dk9Gy-f9k>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] New version of draft-ietf-detnet-raw-industrial-req
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:45:07 -0000

Dear Jinoo,

Apologies for the belated reply, I overlooked somehow to your e-mail.

I agree with your comment. That definition of latency should be
rewritten along what you suggests. We'll do that in the next revision.

Thanks!

BTW, it would be good if other WG folks could take a look at the draft and
provide feedback, so we can improve the document before the next IETF
meeting.

Thanks!

Carlos

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 5:53 AM Jinoo Joung <jjoung@smu.ac.kr> wrote:

> Hello Carlos, thanks for the informative draft,
> which is really helpful for understanding the requirements in the wireless
> environment.
>
> I have a question about the definition of "Latency" in Section 3. It is
> stated:
> "By definition, latency corresponds to the time interval between the
> sending of the first packet of a flow from a source to a destination and
> the time at which the last packet of that flow is received."
>
> How do you define the last packet?
> Is it the last packet of "Transmit data", whose size is e.g. 10-6K bytes
> for 4.4. Display Services?
> In other words, is it the last packet of a single burst of the flow?
>
> I would like to say that the term latency means the delay a SINGLE packet
> experiences, in many cases.
>
> Best regards,
> Jinoo
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:06 AM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <
> cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have posted a version of the RAW Industrial Requirements draft as
>> draft-ietf-detnet-raw-industrial-req:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-raw-industrial-req/
>>
>> We would like to get your feedback on structure, content and any type of
>> suggestion that you might have towards completing the document for WGLC. We
>> believe it should be feasible to do this in a relatively short time with
>> the help and feedback from the WG.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>> --
>> CARLOS J. BERNARDOS https://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/
>> Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
>> YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/CacharREDando/
>> _______________________________________________
>> detnet mailing list
>> detnet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email