[Detnet] Please consider WG AP for draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 04 March 2020 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FE13A0833; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:07:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ncZ6eEJTmIjW; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:07:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89C4E3A08A3; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:07:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e18so916145ljn.12; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:07:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+pljPQQwCkh31nT3SL6VgrQ2TExW9wDzUsxSDfEtzhU=; b=mGnNpDvwZKuQs4pmJSLg3N+WuWvGCso/8oCV9/7QdMd4eVqaQjx51HSg4WxOB9eOq6 AXdGj9DLRTlFP4RoXQe2DFE+uMg0nKifBXaAclc7tdPvTVp7EJBjxI5tMnwsX5GStLGC FvW9a6D6YJKIfG7ke8T2eYYUQvAj/Cp3GLw/1r6A9eXWGvS8BXDr1XOSHeD+W2wX2mvg bTzwmTtePwn6Tg9s1QW9f29JuuiRAxdV1N0MQsAYpz+yju2T30Fd27VXWaMkud3Lwhqx wPnMyy39qR3wytLkL2ZACpl6q3+DfOEZgC0WQNkarox4xXRyJ98XdoD9qMhutBjR8dAh OBBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+pljPQQwCkh31nT3SL6VgrQ2TExW9wDzUsxSDfEtzhU=; b=jfIAqAeblWBKXLX1WOko+MLtqmkC5zReCaC/k+a/TLdCT+263GzqhetDxRnnvF00Ud RNLiXlcNcsX+tfQoSlam4rQBS+1TBM74aBM/RSwNDuc7k4flLXfEl96nMDjxunKTexfK IKsaGpKD/apve8vVFhk5i/N7IqlDaC7V3h4/AbAt6RhffpROuNOVbBcXdc+WlQ+PihRo 1KujhoCgqo5gQLhXddcrXs5pfyyMumJafN7n5JHYCVe1vnE4ATpa1F/pOHzJc2JmgqQ8 GkjOun6SN7uFsSR8cEDs8BfiQjxj9dwJb/Et8ju04SSDNvd+pJnOXoJlvzrFp/EZw3/w FIdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0IzPedRTHhK1DfFMNNhyCx2oQA8jx7PZmdso8Hv0cJiNFQBJhi P3QCGeSWd5z/6PnWVtwFRggyAK+ZTxKGZTneODPe19f9hBY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtRbwPsTy9r12DX+Uyz7ARVcn3yQivlPjoWSX0Ms2R8djqdicBOdLG1Xb3ci7go2xPNCG1935RMvKH9YZfPC9E=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1198:: with SMTP id w24mr1245319ljo.52.1583309232925; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:07:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:07:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUnSaD3ra0maQwrVfatL_xP1Mm8MaWR-CGUti8qc4zSbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065f21205a002e821"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/5yUVWuSg9NhwDMpVt_95gbhQhxQ>
Subject: [Detnet] Please consider WG AP for draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 08:07:27 -0000

Dear All,
back in Singapore, our Chairs asked WG whether there is support for the
adoption of draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam/>. From the
meeting minutes:

Greg Mirsky: Authors believe draft provides viable technical solution, and
would like to request WG adoption of OAM draft.
Lou Berger: Didn't adopt last time since few had read it. Today will do
adoption call for support.

My recollection is that there were more in support comparing to IETF-105.
The authors of the draft believe that the draft is ready for WG AP and
appreciate WG Chairs to consider starting the WG AP.

Regards,
Greg, on behalf of the authors