Re: [Detnet] Please consider WG AP for draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 07 March 2020 22:54 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00D33A1C09; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:54:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vcpq390xYjf8; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:54:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D423D3A1C08; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 14:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id v6so4635887lfo.13; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 14:54:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ge2FuPXAS8jfgrHdOjmjUNtWsSGDi6k1YX4gqbZCeS0=; b=YwJW+VhdP8XukpnGehwC8vAwBFfwRQiC6cq4xO6XDGFzYnW+70m4cePQoLjjDnt02t dB4TQBFFhALuQcGlujoBFFYgAz81LH42f4t0rqC5aMsl0PAWp6kGvAyRuqhodwIsTG95 v4Uvf48vXGnzoZesaqwLGyDEOQ7f+uDfKtsVxSEvvr7X71rwEzZlTfpADsShLX4dV1Xo /TC0CH8ns/CYoI5fw/RuCNlj4RUaBV4IDCO3PG9mT6cTva7F156190Kb3NcS0JVftHuJ WyVQhMOQyApHi4xn+XlKJurS+z5qtPEXYvtmV5pQr8tz35DXuqWaSOaUuN0UUiblUYdM CNVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ge2FuPXAS8jfgrHdOjmjUNtWsSGDi6k1YX4gqbZCeS0=; b=NT2bcVMi7K++yCyr0Lzdu+eAxZ1P9kofDrqgepPKNxk9+eELRsfoeKZ5mYu3s2xnXJ LVJRQP4qRkRtaAi5IeI6aiTIUTrrXWvevT98C3j1RuZX90fvtJcBxcobZMilJ30iYN52 UUB+zDgCLaUGAs1O30c95mKE6evdi++NPdlPqII/0yBk0ODPr9ZDRe9PjByZFOVGWEy4 PAuYo1pUTUkp3oxQVsU8CKACRVtWkLUG79qWDvJvT2g64mkCE1ie0KS/Akr18elRfTOV 6VuBFwpCFcYkS3obF9a90t+f/jVVvTmRLt15iQJyZLNVJiWDbjkpEjOugRyTYhtmV9yk oOKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ32b3XPSPZAiC9zOB27+VoujEduKiQqzqsNzXQDahBF4neonwIk y2110UhrfptqCAQffRgm2Z0If33dfzQQZnZCAUlyWge9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtE8Z5+mLyrZkIu38QvjNibHwd6nuEkKSDkNYqZCpT3U/fdc5rgvWmrit9aZ8MQ3RqTvXcsHtCXeUep5Xn/fiI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4834:: with SMTP id 20mr5236260lft.93.1583621672829; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 14:54:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmUnSaD3ra0maQwrVfatL_xP1Mm8MaWR-CGUti8qc4zSbA@mail.gmail.com> <6dd38191-61b1-d4b8-f7e9-826247e4ae47@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <6dd38191-61b1-d4b8-f7e9-826247e4ae47@labn.net>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:54:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXrLu3cLYYa0uxRM1nLmHw4e6jwu4kUaGJ9Xxsoc_kU6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044873005a04ba7ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/RvnIL8JVrmwsaF2uUWN8uZ54wyg>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Please consider WG AP for draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 22:54:37 -0000
Hi Lou, thank you and Janos for your kind consideration of ou work and starting the WG AP. Regarding the detnet-ip-oam, I believe that we have a good handle on IPv6 and need to iron the IPv4 case. I was hoping to use f2f time at IETF-107 but, due to the circumstances, will go with the tools available. We'll expedite the work to update it for the WG review and discussion. Regards, Greg On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:38 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > Greg, > > We have no objections to starting the call and will do so shortly. > > What are your plans for detnet-ip-oam? The last update still had some > TBD sections and we would like to get to the point where we could adopt > this document as well. > > Lou (and Janos) > > On 3/4/2020 3:07 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote: > > Dear All, > > back in Singapore, our Chairs asked WG whether there is support for > > the adoption of draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam/>. From > > the meeting minutes: > > > > Greg Mirsky: Authors believe draft provides viable technical > > solution, and would like to request WG adoption of OAM draft. > > Lou Berger: Didn't adopt last time since few had read it. Today > > will do adoption call for support. > > > > My recollection is that there were more in support comparing to > > IETF-105. The authors of the draft believe that the draft is ready for > > WG AP and appreciate WG Chairs to consider starting the WG AP. > > > > Regards, > > Greg, on behalf of the authors >