IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-varga-detnet-ip-preof-02

xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Thu, 24 February 2022 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3603A03AA; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:39:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7rbaWlPJsRwj; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1DB3A1289; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4K3wXx21fNz8PxCr; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:38:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.200]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 21O1cWmb024966; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:38:32 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:38:32 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:38:32 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb6216e1981d3f97f1
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202202240938320616325@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: lberger@labn.net
Cc: detnet@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 21O1cWmb024966
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 6216E1A1.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1645666721/4K3wXx21fNz8PxCr/6216E1A1.000/10.30.14.239/[10.30.14.239]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6216E1A1.000/4K3wXx21fNz8PxCr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/7pWsSck0qo931o5fV-a0yD4WIvM>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-varga-detnet-ip-preof-02
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 01:39:13 -0000

Hi Lou,

I have read this draft and support the adoption of this draft by the DetNet WG.
The UDP tunneling is reasonable and stable for DetNet IP to support the PREOF cause it is the existing solution as per [RFC9025].

Best Regards,
Quan


<<[Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-varga-detnet-ip-preof-02
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 22 February 2022 03:28 UTCShow header
Hello, 
 This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-varga-detnet-ip-preof/
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) March 8. 
 Thank you, 
Lou (as Co-chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email