[Detnet] Missed points from the draft-theoleyre-detnet-oam-support presentation
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 19 November 2020 20:51 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4323A11FE; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:51:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0XunWfuUFjw; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:51:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EFE3A11FC; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:51:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y16so7763437ljh.0; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:51:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7cYaRCoS6GO9YoNZ8CsF0EmUIt/seArFwPPlSl+6zvY=; b=fPCs9Lq1B2Y+EvaruzyFZUPsOFmkUidPSQFsFrmN7VnNuky347/Gwuf2HjLqvNXLg5 rvEejKwURFnb35O5qyIJCWp8x5u9xGI3MmA5JIZRx0Ad/dBfFgVIRbaPtSZ0o/u29D8O AVqRZMB86ECYUIdntCmnCYjg9Bm0asR/hUnWxT+WcuO1csLKnVfcpnKtKnfSDZxiQdaR y+pS5s/oxCDVXgUk+Uo41JORCb1qouDjSl0P6ETJ901FhHu+25QnQSgqT28C/hda2x3S tCu5BdGKR3ovctJMk7kptO4TO169YLVM1xSYWsWVuUnFo3ITXnC27r8bQ6VseOxFlbwd 22Gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7cYaRCoS6GO9YoNZ8CsF0EmUIt/seArFwPPlSl+6zvY=; b=UQapj6wipHnhEkGM5nLyESW2hPXInTax4XftCqumpq3/jN49kWd5oA1LfjFse9QtXg elf8kndVhgR03RhDPszJ44JOR/twaEOr/+//PkC/GRvDcPvUdbdYRycnV9hEBs11wWHZ q0eumFHTnWo7WllvgAifqWjY/GNU1/AJzdIOuq/Tyg412Gl96Tx0oRKcl/YJ8QfSu/uq qdk4mB80r7/plYlfUkRvpr5HLdZG+zjns6SlwoC02950v+dpGrPx+9Gw3OBVBBL0vAWa qynlafVgn1YyixKBj4/0+eErU+xIPtkctN3VIv6mxTY+es2GhWme5tWSowgGOpWgdIN9 st8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533v1iz9U+JqdEYLAff3PHVt3ULK3MKjuRWm69WGybTT9S1tXEos xeTc10KHMoQMp7eq6vaadCHCu6VgQpbZ2QJdNdc8//427mw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiuMT2wXbYEQecr7PenANtuRHI8XK/LJJvmsGBJx6FKIKgTi1mcxAxzpZdeAzOQ82M2MB+sx8ZkoixGqHvC4I=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9694:: with SMTP id q20mr6404790lji.279.1605819081839; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:51:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:51:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUzm1mVNgeGeSrw9B5-MnJHEQ1=G6M=VLzsY3VCjs+jNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-theoleyre-detnet-oam-support@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f258b305b47be337"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/8SCPHZ2fGaNr1xGEMpHkvhZS7-I>
Subject: [Detnet] Missed points from the draft-theoleyre-detnet-oam-support presentation
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:51:26 -0000
Dear All,
I've realized that I've missed highlighting two questions to the Working
Group related to OAM drafts already adopted. Here these questions we had
prepared n the presentation:
- draft-ietf-detnet-oam-mpls includes a section that lists common OAM
requirements
- Would this document be a more suitable place for the requirements?
- draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam includes a section on the applicability of a
hybrid OAM in DetNet
- Would this draft be a better place for that material?
Authors of draft-theoleyre-detnet-oam-support welcome your thoughts,
comments and suggestions to these questions, as well as to the draft and
the topic of the DetNet OAM Framework in general, especially from Sue and
David (sorry that I didn't balance time to give the opportunity to discuss
your comments during the meeting).
Regards,
Greg
- [Detnet] Missed points from the draft-theoleyre-d… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] Missed points from the draft-theoley… Janos Farkas