IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 25 June 2020 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE3C3A102D for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NssMxAnjgKlG for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 556213A1026 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw15.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.15]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89551E0CAA for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:24:21 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id oZM5jhdWeYpLeoZM5jXlwd; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:24:21 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=aMDeV41m c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=nTHF0DUjJn0A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=174xjjHKAAAA:20 a=VB46miiLAAAA:20 a=AeqxH4jkoNTLTU44J3gA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=-RoEEKskQ1sA:10:nop_election2020_name_body a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T4jn7Iz0pphqKuiqzMiNvCCiiClSN097ITwmEg7qaYM=; b=z+oauKi8xfmojPhrqeaJkkZhSC me82NucNVWsb476xd9rbA7bQK5cxRKQl2l7ZqCtmwh36ECZtgqS73EZXG9AvzBNeQAEbPLRownTqM YsdrMyj0nlWWa9nWuaqsjdyNn;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=39109 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1joZM5-002NVR-DW; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:24:21 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-ip@ietf.org, Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
References: <159292690639.3288.6217558507015891728@ietfa.amsl.com> <403116c7-6a80-9368-91ac-a0f0d1ba2cb0@labn.net> <CAMMESsyo=nmXmQiRvv1bssUq+mWvtSZ3tJQH+1fOy-0Tdsjj6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d49dac38-d679-d75f-63f6-15614e6cd382@labn.net>
Message-ID: <cd8202db-bbf2-a889-8afe-b771fc2a7efb@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:24:17 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d49dac38-d679-d75f-63f6-15614e6cd382@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1joZM5-002NVR-DW
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:39109
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 6
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/KHQHWTl3zYwLdILuFOdy-RnUKeI>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:24:24 -0000

Alvaro

to be precise, you are looking for:

section 4.3.1: s/MUST/must

section 4.3.2: s/IP MUST/IP must

section 5.3: s/MUST/must

Right?

I think that's fine as it translates to conformance being judged based 
on (a) this document, (b) a yang or control plane document, and (c) 
whichever traffic treatment RFCs/references the yang or control plane 
document reference.  This is reasonable (at least to me).

I think you have two additional points below...

> On June 25, 2020 at 3:57:22 PM, Lou Berger (lberger@labn.net 
> <mailto:lberger@labn.net>) wrote:
>
...
>> >>> BTW, 0 is the IPv6 HbH option -- do you really want to exclude it?
>> >> I think so, but this was not extensively discussed. Do you think it's
>> >> the wrong call?
>> > I don't know.  But if all the other EHs are not excluded there must be
>> > a good reason.  I can imagine ways to use HbH to maybe carry other
>> > flow identification parameter...for later use.  Just thinking out
>> > loud...
>> >

okay, I'll make the change to allow for zero values (assuming no 
objections for others.)

>> >
>> >
>> > ...
>> >>> (8) I believe that these references should be Normative:
>> >>> I-D.ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework and RFC8655.
>> >> the data plane framework is informative so generally references to
>> >> informative docs are informative.
>> > Nope.
>> >
>> > A normative reference is one that "must be read to understand or
>> > implement the technology"...regardless of the status.
>> >
>> > 
>> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/ 
>>
>> >

okay then.

All,

please look at the repo to see if you object/approve of the changes:

https://github.com/detnet-wg/data-plane-drafts/compare/working/lb/iesg-0625

https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/detnet-wg/data-plane-drafts/working/lb/iesg-0625/ip/draft-ietf-detnet-ip.xml

Thank you!

  Lou

 >

>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Alvaro.
>> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email