Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-oam-framework-06

Fabrice Theoleyre <theoleyre@unistra.fr> Fri, 17 June 2022 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <theoleyre@unistra.fr>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425ACC15AAE3; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH=2.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=unistra.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FdXheKNZtNi; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout02-ext4.partage.renater.fr (smtpout02-ext4.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70CAC1527AF; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr [194.254.241.25]) by smtpout20.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A00C0134; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48958A0076; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C632A0087; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr 2C632A0087
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unistra.fr; s=CF279DD4-6F58-4C59-BB33-73FDC6DFC1E3; t=1655468602; bh=myK8rK/3rJN1esLZBXRAizQc3SRoR+rJfQXN8WIcM0E=; h=Mime-Version:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=qiB7UpT7oZIV3Z8fTJdJzgTZM3cPpwruMntxTj1OZ+d+LPxrx9jIZsi237hPlgcJL k6KrAVjsew2/Y0wLd9ingkl2QeLqkPI0F8mK3dCRJZn5Bb/n6Alv4OefVI0WrDeWJ7 Uky+BGsX70Mjq5k3y7EoKDGXNVB4YHObDc4kXxPnpcpH0z3Bxe2MAekKW7QOBXC55K nVFe+q5gAo4oy1hrosl0ZGZNqkzLk0UIGO3IvOua1LBiscKTrzmf/7H1bdPcl0iKAk 21jf1O1gsusKNGSaeyEuc1dyq5tKs6dCr4wxalhNbrtmDvKzUT3UyaPmiZAGxfynzt gDWrCmYqT0SaA==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr
Received: from zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TlIfeAPwA5F8; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:23:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 130.79.91.198 (unknown [194.254.241.250]) by zmtaauth02.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C2179A0076; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:23:21 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3F71A675-9F74-4F30-BA7C-EC885FD63357"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Fabrice Theoleyre <theoleyre@unistra.fr>
In-Reply-To: <ccb63bfe-7401-37ba-9a66-03c9391e5965@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:23:21 +0200
Cc: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "Georgios Z. Papadopoulos" <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr>, "Carlos J. Bernardos" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, Balázs A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <19487447-CCEC-45CE-9133-C84A6E5BCE7F@unistra.fr>
References: <ccb63bfe-7401-37ba-9a66-03c9391e5965@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamState: clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamScore: -100
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedruddvhedggeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecutffgpfetvffgtfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefkfhfvofesghdtmherhhdtjeenucfhrhhomhephfgrsghrihgtvgcuvfhhvgholhgvhihrvgcuoehthhgvohhlvgihrhgvsehunhhishhtrhgrrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieeitdffkeehhedvudegtdeljeduhefhgeetfedufeehfeduieduiedtteelhefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudelgedrvdehgedrvdeguddrvdehtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduleegrddvheegrddvgedurddvhedtpdhhvghlohepudeftddrjeelrdeluddrudelkedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpefhrggsrhhitggvucfvhhgvohhlvgihrhgvuceothhhvgholhgvhihrvgesuhhnihhsthhrrgdrfhhrqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepkedprhgtphhtthhopehlsggvrhhgvghrsehlrggsnhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehgrhgvghhimhhirhhskhihsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghgvohhrghhiohhsrdhprghprgguohhpohhulhhoshesihhmthdqrghtlhgrnhhtihhquhgvrdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopegtjhgstgesihhtrdhutgefmhdr vghspdhrtghpthhtohepsggrlhgriihsrdgrrdhvrghrghgrsegvrhhitghsshhonhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopeflrghnohhsrdfhrghrkhgrshesvghrihgtshhsohhnrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvthhnvghtqdgthhgrihhrshesihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggvthhnvghtsehivghtfhdrohhrgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/KQZL42DagasdE3-hVXDXKjd6kR4>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-oam-framework-06
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:23:39 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Fabrice Theoleyre


> Le 17 juin 2022 à 14:20, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> a écrit :
> 
> [Now with the right draft in the subject line!]
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> In preparation for WG last call
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
> https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/
> 
> Thank you,
> Lou (Co-Chair)
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> 
>