Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-detnet-oam-framework-06

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 5:20 AM Lou Berger <[e-mail]> wrote:

> [Now with the right draft in the subject line!]
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> In preparation for WG last call
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
> https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/
>
> Thank you,
> Lou (Co-Chair)
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>