[Detnet] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-09: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 05 April 2022 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913F93A0864; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, lberger@labn.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <164916784857.605.13209367747849461051@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 07:10:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/KXaA-H0ATtuGqwc-Ck6Cho9OyJw>
Subject: [Detnet] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 14:10:49 -0000

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 11.2. , paragraph 7, comment:
>    [IEEE8021Qcr]
>               IEEE 802.1, "IEEE P802.1Qcr: IEEE Draft Standard for Local
>               and metropolitan area networks - Bridges and Bridged
>               Networks - Amendment: Asynchronous Traffic Shaping", 2017,
>               <http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/cr-drafts/>.

Please link to a public version of this document, if possible.

The document has six authors, which exceeds the recommended author limit. I
assume the sponsoring AD has agreed that this is appropriate?

Thanks to Gyan S. Mishra for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/yMbUVrUjPZYqHTfNd8XwqMwg0FI).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NIT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

Document references draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework-00, but -01 is
the latest available revision.

These URLs in the document did not return content:
 * http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/cr-drafts/

These URLs in the document can probably be converted to HTTPS:
 * http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8403927
 * http://www.ieee802.org/1/

Section 6.4. , paragraph 6, nit:
> cussed in Section 4.2.2; an interleaved regulators does not increase the dela
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The plural noun "regulators" cannot be used with the article "an". Did you mean
"an interleaved regulator" or "interleaved regulators"?

Section 6.4.2. , paragraph 9, nit:
> T, CQF with more buffers can be used and a cycle identification label can be
>                                     ^^^^
Use a comma before "and" if it connects two independent clauses (unless they
are closely connected and short).

Section 6.6. , paragraph 3, nit:
> to entrance of the first node in sub-network 2, and d3_p the delay bound of p
>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^
This word is normally spelled as one. (Also elsewhere.)