IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism-13

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Wed, 31 December 2025 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: detnet@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE0DA0F98C6 for <detnet@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:08:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9OC2jFsVipRp for <detnet@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:08:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-m155101.qiye.163.com (mail-m155101.qiye.163.com [101.71.155.101]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70D2A0F98B9 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LAPTOP09T7970K (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 2f1f74c83 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:08:35 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: detnet@ietf.org
References: PAWPR07MB957724F22A3DDF5D6B25D537F2A7A@PAWPR07MB9577.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com,PAWPR07MB9577E07A7C359B1F1DA9DD43F2A4A@PAWPR07MB9577.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com <20251231145343833qrnReSXLEm_KB8bVSaA1m@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20251231145343833qrnReSXLEm_KB8bVSaA1m@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:08:43 +0800
Message-ID: <004201dc7a24$4cc32120$e6496360$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0043_01DC7A67.5AE7E7C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGSTcQToM6BN8I9ipmT1ndPDKptF7XPqYxA
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Tid: 0a9b733caf9d03a2kunm7ff47cf11bad90
X-HM-MType: 10
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlDTUpDVkhNTEpLSklLQ0sYTVYeHw5VEwETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVCQklOSlVKS0tVSk JLQlkG
Message-ID-Hash: T6VLPQOLZKLPNPOU6VPMBUFZCCPBO35R
X-Message-ID-Hash: T6VLPQOLZKLPNPOU6VPMBUFZCCPBO35R
X-MailFrom: wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-detnet.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism-13
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/Qe4O2SXN-BjWS1MuC_mbKpkbUoI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:detnet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:detnet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:detnet-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,All:



I think the document is well written and ready to be adopted as WG document.

 

Some comments are the followings:

1)  It will be better to add one extra section(“operational consideration”) to describe how to apply the mentioned mechanism in the overall network, not only the implementation mechanism on each node.

The operator needs to know how to run such mechanism within the network, for example, what’s the role of the controller, what’s information should be configured in advance in each node and what’s the requirements of these parameter etc.

2)  Section 15 “Evaluations” should be put into the appendix part, and make the document more concisely.

 

I need some time to evaluate other parts, but this can be left to during the WG document discussion stage later.

 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

 

 

From：JanosFarkas <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> >; 

To：DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org <mailto:detnet@ietf.org> >; 

Cc：DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:detnet-chairs@ietf.org> >; 

Date：2025-12-07 06:31:29

Subject：[Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism-13

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list -- detnet@ietf.org <mailto:detnet@ietf.org> 
To unsubscribe send an email to detnet-leave@ietf.org <mailto:detnet-leave@ietf.org> 

Hi,

 

A correction:

 

This email begins a 4-week adoption poll for:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism/13/

 

IPR has been disclosed for this document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism> &id=draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/82aJUxEmUk1DAtxnT-YbFa0v3jQ/

 

Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the 

list by the end of the day (any time zone) January 2nd.

 

As a reminder this document is part of the larger set of adoption calls 

of the documents discussed at IETF 124:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing/05

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-deadline-based-forwarding/18

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism/13

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf/09

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-glbf/06

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-ontime-forwarding/04

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore/02

 

Thank you,

János (as Co-chair)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status