[Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments

Liang GENG <liang.geng@hotmail.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4731200FF for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYlVZjBG_i-n for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092004105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.4.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB0D1200FE for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+cba8I65EsjJ4KBAOdvg+6TfgtmXe0b1LBGHG0Fz8Bc=; b=DwcMMDIzrUjJ1Lsonxey//J0eOGmDUJheAQk5RCWA1j0tMYaHHkzVJisESVJiwW3i8XknULNwcby19vaWWMbwPgoK31GBB7+RN+iNcINbrv0+XRyclNojShPlpUF/dmOIopNCyvbo3k8fFyy6pU9/1wSPWlanvvGcoHznDX0Kct407JNm9IrvpCRsdSG5neLMoFv04VFpxbhIJmNp/uPlsFxKfqBIDY2wpeIgG3AwkJYNMAUC229cc1KyG0Y1+L+vu5ZLXfHYHOqPnjVCHszqXYrJpoELEP+i4T1JvR6XxZMUXfuY00Ztti7THN5IpNwM6nUVImxYaypswOpNj9lmA==
Received: from SN1NAM02FT044.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.53) by SN1NAM02HT191.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.73.234) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1965.12; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:52:45 +0000
Received: from BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.152.72.60) by SN1NAM02FT044.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.173) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1965.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:52:45 +0000
Received: from BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3180:1c96:d860:b345]) by BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3180:1c96:d860:b345%8]) with mapi id 15.20.1965.017; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:52:45 +0000
From: Liang GENG <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
To: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
CC: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, "peter.j.willis@bt.com" <peter.j.willis@bt.com>, "shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp" <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp>, "'qiangli (D)'" <qiangli3@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments
Thread-Index: AQHVIAiMvlIW7RTI2kKwIvaJSqO8BQ==
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:52:45 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR22MB0771D878C59904BC7E0E0ACC87ED0@BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:BEB4961CF8330E71D7AD3632D8E2CFA814EB8AC474D515AE5AA9A73C249C4572; UpperCasedChecksum:D4206DB9DCDEB76DD783CE6416169CE860DA5D6AF30486D9C39CF47243414099; SizeAsReceived:6765; Count:41
x-tmn: [rr09EeY/t54sMrNCMd2JZH5AUPtvS/X/]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 41
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(5050001)(7020095)(20181119110)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:SN1NAM02HT191;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM02HT191:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tLUswbktEYH6SmOeYnXvd0+88PikECokY+m8CRwyAVaKwPLuvqCxLGVxtmyyH4kZYSUf6XK+GgCovrIUIYqwSRddftDm87IRMy8l5usRihxqWS0YuL14mp9nbMwqQq3qK+qnPDwYybbTgYJlyVtalvVEUa5OqgvSRDBgD+7BwIZZ7vAJt7EX2ZlGkd7NZ7ms
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR22MB0771D878C59904BC7E0E0ACC87ED0BN6PR22MB0771namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dcf10dbe-e003-47e8-5b1d-08d6ee204384
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jun 2019 03:52:45.8245 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM02HT191
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/b-8FPb8Vjv6gnYuBznwHktW2Yr0>
Subject: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:52:50 -0000

Dear all,


Since IETF 104, we have carefully revised draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 according to received comments. The latest 02 version was uploaded and available online https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency/.


This new version collects more technical, operational and management requirements of deploying deterministic latency service on layer 3 networks from the perspective of various service providers.


Comments are welcome!


Best regards,

Liang Geng on behavior of co-authors