Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments
Shunsuke Homma <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp> Wed, 26 June 2019 07:29 UTC
Return-Path: <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3491200EC for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xx_cGwAW9FSO for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp (dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp [202.19.227.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37A4120058 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-dD-Source: Outbound
Received: from zssg-mailmd104.ddreams.local (zssg-mailmd900.ddreams.local [10.160.172.63]) by zssg-mailou104.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C801200FA; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:06 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (zssg-mailmf900.ddreams.local [10.160.172.84]) by zssg-mailmd104.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTP id <0PTP00Q9E3GHOF10@dDREAMS>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23467E6032; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE968E6061; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:05 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with SMTP id C485B8E6055; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:05 +0900 (JST)
X-IMSS-HAND-OFF-DIRECTIVE: localhost:10026
Received: from zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAF58E6055; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:04 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailua105.ddreams.local (unknown [10.160.172.62]) by zssg-mailmf106.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:29:04 +0900 (JST)
Received: from RDSVVDI0392 (unknown [10.171.80.137]) by zssg-mailua105.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTPA id <0PTP001LT3FYZ2F0@dDREAMS>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:28:56 +0900 (JST)
From: Shunsuke Homma <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp>
References: <BN6PR22MB0771D878C59904BC7E0E0ACC87ED0@BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <8aea82da521a4faead2f6cb4652f7d4b@huawei.com> <cd7bbcc689ad4d1e80bb034fab603f65@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <cd7bbcc689ad4d1e80bb034fab603f65@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:28:46 +0900
Message-id: <005b01d52bf0$ca9e6020$5fdb2060$@hco.ntt.co.jp>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005C_01D52C3C.3A887920"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-index: AQMnmUkp2H0Pi7SVpr3C7kb4R5YXsAHemyVbAl6tjtqj5sSDcA==
Content-language: ja
To: "'qiangli (D)'" <qiangli3@huawei.com>, detnet@ietf.org
Cc: peter.j.willis@bt.com, 'Liang GENG' <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/YtcWMQuasQHt5ZrttpIXIsbK_Ys>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 07:29:10 -0000
Hi, I agree that these requirements are important, especially from operator's aspect. Services and applications which are latency sensitive will increase more, and it would be required that enough dynamicity and scalability for utilizing it in carrier-wide networks. Regarding req 7, "scalable" has wide meaning, for example implementation or management aspects, and I hope it is broken down to more concrete requirements in the next revision. Best regards, Shunsuke From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of qiangli (D) Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 12:33 PM To: detnet@ietf.org Cc: shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp; peter.j.willis@bt.com; Liang GENG Subject: Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments Hi all, The Req. 2.2 discusses that DetNet should be able to tolerate a certain degree of clock jitter & wander even within a time synchronous domain. We would like to know if you agree or disagree with this requirement. If you think this requirement is necessary, then to what degree of clock jitter & wander do you expect? BTW, we are going to ask for WG adoption for this document in IETF 105 meeting. That's will be greatly appreciated if you can share your comments to help us further improve this draft. Best regards, Cristina QIANG From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of qiangli (D) Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 4:11 PM To: detnet@ietf.org Cc: shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp; peter.j.willis@bt.com; Liang GENG <liang.geng@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments Hi all, This version has collected 7 requirements, and divided these requirements into optional (SHOULD) and mandatory (MUST) two types as following shows. We authors would like to know if this requirement list is complete, and if the classification is appropriate or not. Your review and comments are highly appropriated. ========================== Req. 1: Must support the dynamic creation, modification and deletion of deterministic services Req. 2.1: Should support asynchronous clocks across domains Req. 2.2 : Should tolerate a certain of clock jitter & wander within a clock synchronous domain Req. 3: Must support Inter-Continental propagation delay Req. 4: Should have self-monitoring capability Req. 5: Should be robust against denial of service attacks Req. 6: Must tolerate failures of links or nodes and topology changes Req. 7: Must be scalable =========================== Best regards, Cristina QIANG From: Liang GENG [ <mailto:liang.geng@hotmail.com> mailto:liang.geng@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 11:53 AM To: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org> detnet@ietf.org Cc: Black, David < <mailto:David.Black@dell.com> David.Black@dell.com>; <mailto:peter.j.willis@bt.com> peter..j.willis@bt.com; <mailto:shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp> shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp; qiangli (D) < <mailto:qiangli3@huawei.com> qiangli3@huawei.com> Subject: draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 revised for comments Dear all, Since IETF 104, we have carefully revised draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency-02 according to received comments. The latest 02 version was uploaded and available online <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-latency/. This new version collects more technical, operational and management requirements of deploying deterministic latency service on layer 3 networks from the perspective of various service providers. Comments are welcome! Best regards, Liang Geng on behavior of co-authors
- [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bounded-l… Liang GENG
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… Janos Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… Janos Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… peter.j.willis
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… peter.j.willis
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet] draft-geng-detnet-requirements-bound… qiangli (D)