IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 20 July 2017 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC53129B43 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QKQaeZqw-3C for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-ss-1812.hostmonster.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C69131771 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw4 (cmgw5 [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24DB1768A1 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:14:28 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id n0ER1v00H2SSUrH010EUlb; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:14:28 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=eYdNR/MH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=G3gG6ho9WtcA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=HFK5DE617edpSaVXpbcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sCs38vCh0cp0Xtj0ArAm3c2uL30ewH8bqHXXJaMb01k=; b=Gop14otUhzXVVsavKYT4Xne8+U iRoEXDT2vIcKr8D+y0KVd73DUd3ft/4dUavdWjR/e0S6cN9ZqxP94ghxmJ2NcY2ibxdZMIU3ZKjJV wVrFW4q/7Up5dhjfX3kZa61Gr;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:44970 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dYALY-002fLx-Um; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:14:25 -0600
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
References: <cc881655-321c-c7a1-6b5d-ea14a30147aa@gmail.com> <5b4b01d30137$820e9860$862bc920$@gmail.com> <e15efb9f-cab0-58e6-8a4f-32a386eb1fee@gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <f830446c-64a2-bd62-e296-f12b92fd4dc0@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:14:22 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e15efb9f-cab0-58e6-8a4f-32a386eb1fee@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dYALY-002fLx-Um
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:44970
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 6
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/iUQw7pvBynnUs787KzgCTIdbIDU>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:42:28 -0000

Stewart,

    Please reread BCP 25 section 6.5.  Also, the intent has/remains to
formally close the DT once we have a Data Plane Solution documented in a
-00 WG draft. 

Lou


On 7/20/2017 2:05 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Jouni
>
> The DT should have been shut down at the last IETF and the design 
> process taken into the WG at that stage.
>
> Closed DTs are exclusionary and not the mode of operation that the IETF 
> should use other than for short periods and then under exceptional 
> circumstances.
>
> - Stewart
>
> On 20/07/2017 10:06, Jouni wrote:
>> Stewart,
>>
>> Calls _were_ within the DT.. but no more calls unless there is a compelling desire to prolong the "DT style" work.
>>
>> - Jouni
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 10:51 AM
>>> To: detnet-chairs@ietf.org; detnet@ietf.org
>>> Subject: The detnet design team calls
>>>
>>> Are the Detnet dataplane DT calls open to any participant, or are they
>>> closed to the design team with reporting to the WG after the meeting?
>>>
>>> Stewart
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email