Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Stewart,

    I think you are talking disjoint  points, and has nothing to do with
the DT. 

The content of an individual draft is *always* controlled by the
individuals.

The content of a WG document is *always* controlled by the WG.
Although, authors/editors certainly have significant latitude in how
they gauge/establish WG consensus.

In this case, the WG is requesting changes from the individuals  in
their draft.  If they choose not to include the changes, we can choose
to not adopt or object to its adoption.

Lou

On 7/20/2017 2:16 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Why not close it now so that all discussion takes place openly on the list?
>
> Stewart
>
>
> On 20/07/2017 13:14, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Stewart,
>>
>>      Please reread BCP 25 section 6.5.  Also, the intent has/remains to
>> formally close the DT once we have a Data Plane Solution documented in a
>> -00 WG draft.
>>
>> Lou
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/2017 2:05 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>>> Jouni
>>>
>>> The DT should have been shut down at the last IETF and the design
>>> process taken into the WG at that stage.
>>>
>>> Closed DTs are exclusionary and not the mode of operation that the IETF
>>> should use other than for short periods and then under exceptional
>>> circumstances.
>>>
>>> - Stewart
>>>
>>> On 20/07/2017 10:06, Jouni wrote:
>>>> Stewart,
>>>>
>>>> Calls _were_ within the DT.. but no more calls unless there is a compelling desire to prolong the "DT style" work.
>>>>
>>>> - Jouni
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 10:51 AM
>>>>> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>>>>> Subject: The detnet design team calls
>>>>>
>>>>> Are the Detnet dataplane DT calls open to any participant, or are they
>>>>> closed to the design team with reporting to the WG after the meeting?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stewart
>