Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls
Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 12:05 UTC
Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2808E12EA7C; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwji9fM91_Gk; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81FA7131A86; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id p204so3314984wmg.1; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=9S2efumNshkvPhJVeAAMbHlRxiwywEY2gH/jqEjyJ2Y=; b=NIgRDs5iEf4XFEcdmuagLAab8ds86B8q80uRfKFzNRluGLyTEkItaYklUrM6cQAHhc kXfaPp4rmClExjBRaXgAJAQwu1mVaPbIJebeyNNzcF0wu3vs+rxBR/JdW01MzmP7Y/Wl 1tQsuxnnHtPeGEvE45xIre4/J8vos9eRwhzzZDc6zDAHH4C1IfHu8sfgKFy8tmE6Z7AU jAMq//i6chvk26xfiHFJy+/FsuiQdp1ewj0KZBUxTn64eP7qqF+VMKRQLw/6vH4Xytx4 puLzq5/1FdGYCdwVIhsr/X9WPNklV4sPOy/UR6cFU2mlpFX9e9qEJt9DvELhrqnFA9qu hINg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=9S2efumNshkvPhJVeAAMbHlRxiwywEY2gH/jqEjyJ2Y=; b=YtSAbUIXheX5wxVX1XVyQFMo1y+kjXggDbjrQ9kwd9F4a2qUJ8yAHgf6Q0EHmm3buX fk7dlx2DY5RMiNrEZw481Kx5cEucwnUKoJFFq0bXrGO1W0lg0LluYko1cgTjrXXwph/c JKq0F+lLBjWgtuQIXn6Eo4yHV0ydEbfJIfxZQdwQ7XzTtVXZzWvzcnZMCGVhYL7iqqhQ U2EBTPdv0TQqADfhNRWRxNXhdzYnyc6JJthcIGFWP0LBkPKlLBQVlXg/73jFF9PXfAyi KskDIezlnDYN9DVe8qlr5R2HiiPLSYD/a7LVRtt17OTiJ+V7FesDGd2oHW8AnOS6Wh5k kgrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111BjMyvNrTBONZiCHPDjrWr45gV5+tHZ8oZ4QTpjs2+9hv+qaol ApHpSmRGobB9f/p2g+Q=
X-Received: by 10.28.45.197 with SMTP id t188mr2289255wmt.78.1500552349786; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:3852:a6dc:c6c8:2acc? ([2001:67c:370:128:3852:a6dc:c6c8:2acc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 127sm3188323wmv.1.2017.07.20.05.05.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
References: <cc881655-321c-c7a1-6b5d-ea14a30147aa@gmail.com> <5b4b01d30137$820e9860$862bc920$@gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e15efb9f-cab0-58e6-8a4f-32a386eb1fee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:05:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5b4b01d30137$820e9860$862bc920$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/JQIhj1y5-5X1vbUGdMCN3XAQ4rw>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:05:55 -0000
Jouni The DT should have been shut down at the last IETF and the design process taken into the WG at that stage. Closed DTs are exclusionary and not the mode of operation that the IETF should use other than for short periods and then under exceptional circumstances. - Stewart On 20/07/2017 10:06, Jouni wrote: > Stewart, > > Calls _were_ within the DT.. but no more calls unless there is a compelling desire to prolong the "DT style" work. > > - Jouni > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 10:51 AM >> To: detnet-chairs@ietf.org; detnet@ietf.org >> Subject: The detnet design team calls >> >> Are the Detnet dataplane DT calls open to any participant, or are they >> closed to the design team with reporting to the WG after the meeting? >> >> Stewart >
- [Detnet] The detnet design team calls Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls Jouni
- Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] The detnet design team calls Lou Berger