Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc-access-network-identifier-04 - Ends May 2, 2013
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 18 April 2013 06:17 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387A621F8F22 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKkaceduKjIX for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66D921F8F1A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:16:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x11so2356858lbi.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=B757w0Y+jYyjql7KlvdjBIxlVlIWW2rM5dGtdEGhsD0=; b=JIEe2DOJ174p8u6e149Cs4wKHxXiU35Vb92l9tJorMiwT6ciPfJ/ETKwL+xdzQ9mvY jFQpdUyhRf7BoaxJwW9ii5+OhaciSTAlC/Q17Mur7rZu+plVKJWoJozr9N5/bpUrremp esmGOFB2jtBix9Yymh8Yq0hrPepoQgxya1F4Wm0PcwbHUga1+NbZhIRRO0/QVJtT8qWA nH8N2xfV97UEDTBpyX0AB1eWjAZm7C9LMkPiz7G+HZW/6dr8nPW4fmA2HpYTl7nnfedU iYgvOh/B+hUCYan2IzV3dVV3rPmmMH/n/zyZnFL8a9onYBqOnASggsuwkvoVQB/EolAK UX2Q==
X-Received: by 10.112.150.34 with SMTP id uf2mr5158901lbb.1.1366265817750; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.250.209] ([194.100.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6sm3753356lae.3.2013.04.17.23.16.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAceRUehOV9PWU68oofXOLd3EwwBs0NS=vh37T0KHmKsngw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:16:56 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <09F34B71-C08D-4BE6-9519-C5BB953B5703@gmail.com>
References: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077514D333@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <24C0F3E22276D9438D6F366EB89FAEA810233F0C@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> <CAC8QAceRUehOV9PWU68oofXOLd3EwwBs0NS=vh37T0KHmKsngw@mail.gmail.com>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc-access-network-identifier-04 - Ends May 2, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:17:01 -0000
On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sri, > > I think that Client/Server behaviour (Section 7 & 9) in the draft needs some clarification. I could agree on that. The current text is 'slightly' thin ;-) - Jouni > > Please check Bernie's mail: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg11144.html > on draft-ietf-dhc-80211-option-01.txt. > > Also please check the operation described in Li's draft: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xue-dhc-location-option-01 > > Regards, > > Behcet > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgundave@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Thanks for your comments. > > This requirement is not coming from any SDO. We believe this is a generic > requirement for IETF based IP architectures. > > As you are aware, many operators are deploying large scale SP WiFI > networks. These deployments are based on standard IETF protocols and > architectures (tunneling, mobility, Routing, AAA protocols ...). In many > of these deployments the subscriber services are tied to the access > network, for example, the initial portal page may be different based on > the user location (SSID, AP Mac address ..). These parameters are > typically carried on DHCP option-82, and are coded in a vendor basis. > There is no standard encoding that a backend system can reliably depend on > for learning these parameters. In the past when WiFI was largely contained > to enterprises, with single vendor solutions, this worked fine. But, now > in many deployments there are multi-vendor systems and interop is > required. The draft is trying to attempt to fix that gap. We want to drive > this work in DHC, not using a liaison statement, but as a gap in IETF > protocols, to solve a practical deployment issue and improve > interoperability. > > I'm copying Hui Deng, CMCC. They are deploying large scale SP WIFI > networks and he can comment on this. > > > > > Regards > Sri > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/17/13 7:59 AM, "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote: > > >When we talked about this earlier, I said that it might be better to have > >this work done in DHC rather than forcing it to find a new working group > >because it seemed to be something that was being asked for by other SDOs. > > However, the authors never said anything about that over and above what > >they've already said in meetings, so I don't actually have a clear > >picture of who is asking for this. Looking in the data tracker, I don't > >find any liaison statement requesting that this work be done. > > > >The authors have expressed a great deal of urgency about this work, and I > >don't want to delay it any further, so I will state that as a > >participant, I'm in favor of the working group taking on the work. > >However, with my AD hat on, I would like to get some kind of actual > >request for help from the SDOs who want this functionality before the end > >of the call for adoption. Otherwise I think Bernie's concern that the > >DHC working group really isn't qualified to evaluate the validity of the > >option contents will remain unaddressed, and I think it's a valid concern. > > > >The request from the SDOs should be of the form "we need DHCP options to > >deliver the following bits of functionality," and should briefly describe > >the functionality that's needed, and refer to the documents that the SDO > >is working on that support this need. > > > >If this need is not really coming from these SDOs, but rather from some > >IETF working group, then perhaps Bernie's original observation was > >correct, and this work should be done in that working group instead. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >dhcwg mailing list > >dhcwg@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc-acc… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Florin Baboescu
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Rajat Ghai
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Hui Deng
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-bhandari-dhc… Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)