[dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Tue, 22 April 2003 16:51 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA16003 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:51:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3MH2rl21108 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:02:53 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3MH2r821105 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:02:53 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15993 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:50:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198110-00033U-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:53:06 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 198110-00033R-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:53:06 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3MGv6820816; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:57:07 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3MGra820677 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:53:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15816 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:41:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1980s1-00031C-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:43:49 -0400
Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1980s0-000314-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:43:48 -0400
Received: from westrelay01.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.10]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.9/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h3MGhEuT041744; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:43:14 -0400
Received: from cichlid.adsl.duke.edu (sig-9-65-244-156.mts.ibm.com [9.65.244.156]) by westrelay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.8/NCO/VER6.5) with ESMTP id h3MGhD98058788; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:43:13 -0600
Received: from cichlid.adsl.duke.edu (narten@localhost) by cichlid.adsl.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h3MGfMl03743; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:41:22 -0400
Message-Id: <200304221641.h3MGfMl03743@cichlid.adsl.duke.edu>
To: Paul Duffy <paduffy@cisco.com>
cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:41:21 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
I've gone ahead and asked for the IETF LC to start for this document. A few small comments: > Code Len TCM > +-----+-----+-----+-----+ > | TBD | 2 | m1 | m2 | > +-----+-----+-----+-----+ It might be better to not have m1/m2, since the text talks about a single 16-bit field rather than two smaller fields. > The length MUST be 2. The TCM field is encoded as an unsigned 16 > bit quantity per network byte-ordering rules. Each bit of the TCM better wording for bit ordering might be: The length MUST be 2. The TCM field is encoded as an unsigned 16 bit quantity in network byte order. Each bit of the TCM > 5. IANA Considerations what about future assignments of bit values? > However, the scenario described above is unlikely to occur. > Within the cable delivery architecture required by the various > CableLabs projects, the DHCP client is connected to a network > through a cable modem and the CMTS (head-end). The CMTS is > explicitly configured with a set of DHCP servers to which DHCP > requests are forwarded. Further, a correctly configured CMTS > will only allow downstream traffic from specific IP > addresses/ranges. Could be more clear. I don't follow the last sentence, for example. Thomas _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Paul Duffy
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Paul Duffy
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Bud Millwood
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Paul Duffy
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Bud Millwood
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt Christopher Zydel