Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt

Christopher Zydel <chris@cv.net> Tue, 29 April 2003 14:39 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA24789 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:39:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3TEiAL17680 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:44:10 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3TEiA817677 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:44:10 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA24748 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:38:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3TEcr817236; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:38:53 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3SEek815615 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:40:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03120 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:35:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19A9lR-0003H1-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:37:53 -0400
Received: from srv1.mail.cv.net ([167.206.112.40]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19A9lR-0003Gy-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:37:53 -0400
Received: from cv.net (landsraad.eng.cv.net [167.206.9.45]) by srv1.mail.cv.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0HE200F7Z5YWP4@srv1.mail.cv.net> for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:37:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:38:03 -0400
From: Christopher Zydel <chris@cv.net>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt
In-reply-to: <200304281055.05202.budm@weird-solutions.com>
To: Bud Millwood <budm@weird-solutions.com>
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, Paul Duffy <paduffy@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Message-id: <3EAD3CCB.50800@cv.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401
References: <200304231936.h3NJaeDN014292@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <200304281055.05202.budm@weird-solutions.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bud Millwood wrote:

>On Wednesday 23 April 2003 21.36, Thomas Narten wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>>>       Code   Len      TCM
>>>>>      +-----+-----+-----+-----+
>>>>>
>>>>>      | TBD |  2  | m1  | m2  |
>>>>>
>>>>>      +-----+-----+-----+-----+
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>It might be better to not have m1/m2, since the text talks about a
>>>>single 16-bit field rather than two smaller fields.
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>FWIW, I agree with Thomas. I think it's just misleading to have it split if 
>it's a 16 bit field. The picture above implies a struct with two bytes, and 
>some need to work with the bytes separately
>

RFC 2132 uses the format used above repeatedly.   Maybe that is worth 
revisiting, but I don't think this draft should wait for such a debate 
to reach concensus.

Chris

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg