IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-korhonen-dhc-pd-exclude

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3043A6C34 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.247, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fqtidmxr8MdA for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.162]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 150EF3A6953 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 52101 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Sep 2010 15:42:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285688562; bh=zKZ2qTsOIUwHl77UMbwN6iKyyNQtDXqxpSQCE5NUNJg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s3btGIGlKhB6vbz3QsTgSI8qW1N1RSzdueRTXno7ee8cbOhAVNuHPa6Qy2VTsJbitfPVp0CN6e77dt5EJs+x20pl7EPsF84kzwF2gLo8t1wnIt2/AsyJy4Fe/ZKG46NNnhoWn7a3ML4cgZQO50SSa5mkxr0UerGQ+/KcBuAh1rI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IbHQ4NNnEPOE2rTcNifpkOSVNnt5l4xcGmrJ3LfRoP83kaqKkNnhXVvMj3QAcqRaHbPdM/uO46p0/C78ycFdzLYOGxfsoIEFBL/nsjiTZReXgnT3Ob6FfmaSB0PU+Lqj+GZUMKJ0ljn/aD77gLVYLhigcnWsexmAL21BSU6B+pk=;
Message-ID: <395131.37127.qm@web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 6rXTTycVM1m1871guwp6pfWvYeEjrITAeeckUkvPh0F.17z rr0R0Src.ASr2wdKzEL5a0NVPjBmpKCtls_OfGneG3GP72GQoK8UXRsb8GmW CpkIWLgZnas.q7W5UVQ3t6.TOi59T1h6UR6UR9r3otWmjnVvlmTE.bChuNQ5 T.27dPunf7VTwWRuEDdbUy_vgm7ZNAx3r23zqUscickcLLqnWf20bNYtyfWp Tx4Hj10BORODw8DNzJn9gpLnWKknsv4rgR8qVW2LjGBxLS1lJ9lCIG2Kx9od jo1.oHirwY4IBaTQs4hBmgwB8.VAo0nAGD9DjOirRE_isugxL.gKYJhFuzRB KxfeOp6s.Ga.Aiebv.uIKXHrmR4Et4fDe
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:42:41 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950
References: <FDA14EDB-1614-4BCE-8C56-219EA7DAD404@nominum.com> <555411.10174.qm@web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <40958B55-31CE-4E70-8F05-088A98A5220F@employees.org> <986665.74148.qm@web111412.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <7D045190-18DD-4060-BA18-544306494129@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:42:41 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7D045190-18DD-4060-BA18-544306494129@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.orgGroup" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-korhonen-dhc-pd-exclude
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:42:05 -0000

----- Original Message ----
> From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
> To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>; Behcet Sarikaya 
><behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>; "dhcwg@ietf.orgGroup" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
> Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010 4:54:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-korhonen-dhc-pd-exclude
> 
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > There is simply no  need for such a thing :-).
> 
> This is kind of a weird objection.    Clearly the authors of the draft have 
>some reason for building the thing the  draft documents.   Perhaps it would be 
>more fruitful to discuss whether  this is the right way to address the use case 
>they are addressing with this  draft, rather than simply dismissing whatever 
>their use case is as  nonexistent?   I mean, if they don't actually *have* a use 
>case, then your  point would prevail, but I assume they do or they wouldn't have 
>bothered to make  the proposal!
> 

OK, using your logic, the same set of authors has made a draft about stateless 
PD. They did bother making one. It is at: 
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-savolainen-stateless-pd-01.txt in case you have 
not seen it.

Now they are making this proposal which is kind of the reverse proposal.

Can you please point out why you are picking up this one and not the other one?

The point is that authors make all sorts of proposals. It is up to the WG to 
advance it or not.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email