[dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id

[Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>]

It was my impression that this had passed WGLC, but it turns out that nobody said anything in favor of the draft during the WGLC.   There was substantial review, and the document is pretty good, but it hasn't actually passed WGLC.   I think there is substantial support for the document, but we need to actually see that support on the mailing list.

So if you want the draft to proceed to the IESG, please indicate your support for it here on the mailing list.   If you object, please indicate that as well.   The original WGLC was at the end of June, and nobody registered any objections then, so if I don't hear any objections by close of business on Friday, and I do hear substantial support, I'm going to call that consensus.

Please accept my apologies for the confusion around this issue--I should have noticed this and issued a new WGLC a lot sooner, but for some reason the bit got set in my mind that it had passed WGLC, and so it was just waiting for me or John to do a final review before doing the shepherd writeup; it was during that review that I noticed the lack of responses to the WGLC.