Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id

Mukund Kamath <Mukund_Kamath@infosys.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Mukund_Kamath@infosys.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53453A6EBF for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YOeBOA46uW7f for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kecgate06.infosys.com (Kecgate06.infosys.com [122.98.14.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48F53A6DA3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <06cecc4000015415@kecgate06.infosys.com>
Received: from blrkechub03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.43]) by kecgate06.infosys.com ([122.98.14.33]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.0) id 06cecc4000015415 ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:46:16 +0530
Received: from BLRKECMBX03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.23]) by blrkechub03.ad.infosys.com ([10.66.236.43]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:45:02 +0530
From: Mukund Kamath <Mukund_Kamath@infosys.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, DHC Working Group <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:44:21 +0530
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id
Thread-Index: ActfImWjUkk4tFQQRSKJGEv+diRdSQApRGYz
Message-ID: <AB760FBDB8F14D4294F596941D2CABA9189AEC32E9@BLRKECMBX03.ad.infosys.com>
References: <C76E1A28-B54F-4143-8F74-6E8616F49A67@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <C76E1A28-B54F-4143-8F74-6E8616F49A67@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:14:23 -0000

I am in support of the document.

Regards,
Mukund Kamath
________________________________________
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon [Ted.Lemon@nominum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:31 AM
To: DHC Working Group
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id

It was my impression that this had passed WGLC, but it turns out that nobody said anything in favor of the draft during the WGLC.   There was substantial review, and the document is pretty good, but it hasn't actually passed WGLC.   I think there is substantial support for the document, but we need to actually see that support on the mailing list.

So if you want the draft to proceed to the IESG, please indicate your support for it here on the mailing list.   If you object, please indicate that as well.   The original WGLC was at the end of June, and nobody registered any objections then, so if I don't hear any objections by close of business on Friday, and I do hear substantial support, I'm going to call that consensus.

Please accept my apologies for the confusion around this issue--I should have noticed this and issued a new WGLC a lot sooner, but for some reason the bit got set in my mind that it had passed WGLC, and so it was just waiting for me or John to do a final review before doing the shepherd writeup; it was during that review that I noticed the lack of responses to the WGLC.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not 
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and 
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken 
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage 
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your 
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail 
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the 
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***