Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id

[Stephen Jacob <[e-mail]>]

In the words of Niall O'Reilly:  support++

I had comments on the draft back in July, but they were addressed to my
satisfaction.

Please add my +1 to this.

Regards,
Stephen

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:31:34AM -0700, Ted Lemon wrote:
> It was my impression that this had passed WGLC, but it turns out that
> nobody said anything in favor of the draft during the WGLC.   There
> was substantial review, and the document is pretty good, but it hasn't
> actually passed WGLC.   I think there is substantial support for the
> document, but we need to actually see that support on the mailing
> list.
> 
> So if you want the draft to proceed to the IESG, please indicate your
> support for it here on the mailing list.   If you object, please
> indicate that as well.   The original WGLC was at the end of June, and
> nobody registered any objections then, so if I don't hear any
> objections by close of business on Friday, and I do hear substantial
> support, I'm going to call that consensus.
> 
> Please accept my apologies for the confusion around this issue--I
> should have noticed this and issued a new WGLC a lot sooner, but for
> some reason the bit got set in my mind that it had passed WGLC, and so
> it was just waiting for me or John to do a final review before doing
> the shepherd writeup; it was during that review that I noticed the
> lack of responses to the WGLC.

-- 
 Stephen Jacob | [e-mail] | [phone]
 Nominum, Inc. |  http://www.nominum.com/  | [phone]