IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A66C3A6BF8 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x3zxI+EJy09d for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F35F3A6A14 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTKKnwZ/gFhzvkQC7zt5ilAcrapYqLsFw@postini.com; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:43:14 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (exchange-10.nominum.com [64.89.228.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "exchange-10.win.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A4D1B8332 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange-10.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.57]) by exchange-10.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.57]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:43:13 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Stephen Jacob <Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:44:01 -0700
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id
Thread-Index: ActfgA7rg4tfLgc6SQyRylRxW0V5hA==
Message-ID: <B917ED76-CA2F-471F-BC47-59E7331D660D@nominum.com>
References: <C76E1A28-B54F-4143-8F74-6E8616F49A67@nominum.com> <20100929004006.GA21974@shell-too.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100929004006.GA21974@shell-too.nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: DHC Working Group <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:42:35 -0000

On Sep 28, 2010, at 5:40 PM, "Stephen Jacob" <Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com> wrote:

> In the words of Niall O'Reilly:  support++

Thanks!

BTW, I did actually have one minor suggestion.   If there's strong resistance I'll withdraw it, but if nobody objects I think it'll be a win: the draft currently requires the server to respond with a remote-id option even if it wasn't requested.  I think it would be better to place the burden on the access concentrator to request the option, and if it doesn't, all bets are off.  This would eliminate the need for a bit of special code in the server to check for the missing option in the ORO.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email