IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59983A6A50 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kvgugPssB+tm for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC62A3A6AA4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTKM5XZcyj/kted1CtJGeqmrLZDyp9z3G@postini.com; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:04:33 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (exchange-10.nominum.com [64.89.228.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "exchange-10.win.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC41C1B9339; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange-10.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.57]) by exchange-10.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.57]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:04:28 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Pavan Kurapati <pavan.kurapati@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:05:22 -0700
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id
Thread-Index: Actf1tjbDX3/0tSGR/ik9wfBhD3t0w==
Message-ID: <C866B408-DB7E-44C8-B32B-4FC3EA1F8262@nominum.com>
References: <C76E1A28-B54F-4143-8F74-6E8616F49A67@nominum.com> <20100929004006.GA21974@shell-too.nominum.com> <B917ED76-CA2F-471F-BC47-59E7331D660D@nominum.com> <20100929032903.GA27518@shell-too.nominum.com> <AANLkTim1vUrCOb2dBPL6uN1fGQJAVjoVf9m+kYvMez0b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim1vUrCOb2dBPL6uN1fGQJAVjoVf9m+kYvMez0b@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: DHC Working Group <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:03:53 -0000

On Sep 28, 2010, at 9:53 PM, "Pavan Kurapati" <pavan.kurapati@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have one question. If an option is requested in parameter-request
> list, should DHCP server return that option as a MUST? RFC 2132 is not
> worded very clearly in this respect. RFC 2132 says " The client MAY
> list the options in order of preference.  The DHCP
>   server is not required to return the options in the requested
> order, but MUST try to insert the requested options in the order
> requested by the client", but it doesnt say that DHCP server MUST
> return the options listed in the parameter request list?

The server doesn't have to return an option to the client if there's no option to return, regardless of the contents of the prl.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email