Re: [dhcwg] [Snac] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix change

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 11 November 2023 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CA4C16F3E3 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:03:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jequGcz-zyPR for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51601C16F40C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-67131800219so17732706d6.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:03:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1699697009; x=1700301809; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lBCzKpXhhwuPEWBTuD2loOlJvsIo+ZltsqNzp9QgQAc=; b=zySU6X1lfalHs+UDRJnhrMagw8ogemqjOBPXGiD++bmYe8N5Qt+iS5bi3iJZFZUIsr 6px1uvzctFG9yrBBmLIvn0Z4IsrHo8wlZz3E9/btOvYT1GwqY5MaFd/SOtvMPEc1WU+C 9z5XH5VHs33soK0UwYbK+vmigQOLNIGYJM81RfPdFMxtkoBEPHmR8sy8V7mAZEZ5dFYg 4K+HhUzZHgy9cXi+GYRyXjQFKnh6nN+1CdLttRzChpdw+gueXig78xGRk1FTDFQFusQe 1BhOHI7hcy/9do0gG/Yu7CznJk5A1EeVX49QgY6htUzFXtzihgQKcaKZU2Y/zogkbfyN eEUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699697009; x=1700301809; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lBCzKpXhhwuPEWBTuD2loOlJvsIo+ZltsqNzp9QgQAc=; b=pqY/NnPo8BDvNOvFpEPrg+uCZIOg8TTwae4AhhjKy12pA/Bl2l54WWnYIEEQM5x7i5 +GSU+Ea1nz4YXUskoYzp8UHLSDbn+W0lTK3PLYN2L7/STfoZQI7wcG3EzfZOht43HXCY c9BrvVWtxjrFlvwGToSwWRCX/0UGKwbcI7Uacrs7HTVpO3YYCGiiV9opVNsKJ95BY8jK scd/zC2AdB/Bne0tOccHMsAGGG1VlUP0lUDBqPJoh1+antG/ByYgCg4STxhgN+g3ccmg p7RvCrE+z2amxFQO1bkUEeBnbaQP+kh8YRNM9ALuMiESJ8VEIH/3hceYNtxb78j3t+zn 9zrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyCQ3WDZXubo13NGW9VGYKogFm49xvvTXlp0wA7JudcvSgxGmrC TehsCgXsLlqASntOdHdC2qNHD3+NPJOsVOGqNl1AVg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJtdBPHQaRpUZ2B9cHhkNtXTDMztf2mn75iZg2SAo/1pCBaS/GjUKx9QLhuQnqsPk+vMyhYgrZNLYS3s6ne/k=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:558c:0:b0:66d:2fda:c9e0 with SMTP id f12-20020ad4558c000000b0066d2fdac9e0mr1555934qvx.61.1699697008955; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:03:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DU0P190MB1978DC76946D2CD331DE7232FDADA@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <B3DC0678-CBC8-4F7A-9CAA-24F8FBA046E7@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <B3DC0678-CBC8-4F7A-9CAA-24F8FBA046E7@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 11:03:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3KRHtWe=qFQzW2H5GzMZrsdEu1pGFZwCFGoBNbQtZZCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, snac@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000722f840609dd8cbc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/26W9et9GdZMyC7fFsIpwcjGq_is>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Snac] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix change
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:30 -0000

On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, 10:56 Ole Troan, <otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> A DHCPv6 PD client is a router. Per RFC4861 routers do not process Router
> Advertisements (with the exception of doing consistency validation).
> Following from that the M-bit should have no effect on the PD client.
>

That's not true in all cases - for example, RFC 7084 CE routers are PD
clients but they listen to router advertisements. SNAC routers as currently
specified in the draft. also listen to RAs.

>