IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] [Snac] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix change

Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org> Sat, 11 November 2023 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591F0C1705E3; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:22:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.213
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.213 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J4EYfNdBMIUA; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (proxmox01.kjsl.com [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:6::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E8DC16F40D; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 02:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0404BE4208; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:22:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=employees.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=prox2023; bh=Uxaom+ORkpEHuDhK G+s87UuqoGx34sBqQAHZqTYYpvI=; b=iCIEk78IfH/yEDwA/qeSgCgxggPuZep9 2/ez9Ei1N1FyczzBfQ59XUq/RLWUpJ99cJjRtz4oUUR2wU4JwvhGQmVr0B1rHYja 41YkMe0tnr8Q/te7SCXCmUeoNh9NYVlbZ2DbGXuFXak/9ZcF06Om0+ujCQBUuhv+ cZ9XFXdefyqxP+ErROyit5TwvH/MRaXdRNBKtTyu3j83VP3UmxPp32qJbsO+zhwX CAluprZff8acSBF6pRSi6kliDaZGMfeN2zTSe9fnXFwjZKPPwb+Y5icrGbxLnk6Z 1BAD0GUqydVd3Eh8301Fdec7nIkXoq3eLOvlCUdxnQTE7N3L7g0uYA==
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BA4DBE4201; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:22:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2001:4650:c3ed:37a:d3ee:77f3:1449:1daa]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 443534E11AC9; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:22:25 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-DDAEBE4A-BE41-4EB1-80DF-9222649DA238"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 11:22:11 +0100
Message-Id: <0AFAD962-734A-4084-A808-192C9E0FE1CA@employees.org>
References: <CAKD1Yr3KRHtWe=qFQzW2H5GzMZrsdEu1pGFZwCFGoBNbQtZZCA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, snac@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3KRHtWe=qFQzW2H5GzMZrsdEu1pGFZwCFGoBNbQtZZCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21B91)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2MKJVwmz8fvO9I0SdxA6k6r7z0Y>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Snac] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis / clarification of significant prefix change
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:22:30 -0000



On 11 Nov 2023, at 11:03, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:


On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, 10:56 Ole Troan, <otroan=40employees.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
A DHCPv6 PD client is a router. Per RFC4861 routers do not process Router Advertisements (with the exception of doing consistency validation). Following from that the M-bit should have no effect on the PD client.

That's not true in all cases - for example, RFC 7084 CE routers are PD clients but they listen to router advertisements. SNAC routers as currently specified in the draft. also listen to RAs.

An RFC7084 CE router act both as a host and a router on its WAN interface. A host for the purpose of assigning addresses to the WAN interface and to do router discovery. For the purpose of PD and forwarding it acts as a router.

There is no conflation between the two roles. 

O. 

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email