Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for Prague?

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 17 March 2011 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CA13A6ADA for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HsxU0gUXUkRE for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA5E3A6AD0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTYJBOUz+FUX+STFwG/sZ7pG3M83ZIu/w@postini.com; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:13:30 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3461B85F7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E3419005C; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.1.10.122] (24.91.95.36) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.228.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.255.0; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:13:29 -0700
References: <BF307AAD-2CFE-4EF4-936B-6AC70BD8853F@nominum.com> <CE1D4D92-4B34-47A4-8B71-2D62E162F47C@employees.org>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--47770530"
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117)
In-Reply-To: <CE1D4D92-4B34-47A4-8B71-2D62E162F47C@employees.org>
Message-ID: <04A7E35F-905A-4936-911E-AEB4B650F4E1@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:12:36 -0400
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117)
X-Originating-IP: [24.91.95.36]
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for Prague?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:12:03 -0000

On Mar 17, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> which do you prefer? that we present the idea to DHC now, even though it is half baked, or wait until we have something more concrete in the way of option format to discuss?
> 

Lets have you present it. That's what we're here for.