IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for Prague?

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 17 March 2011 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495463A696D for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1qE0fnxQWvt for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A1F3A695F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so2278419wwa.13 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=BuJD9iSn9q1+BgyLX8XkJ6bxBaPAIe3g6Eb/D3I+zYI=; b=dluxNoiPaRFy7dfJztd+d3ZnqVj36J1DGQhTWqZN0pP2u+vhrUvHV2uYyKdcOVIB08 wQlm4cf3AhoWIDU48AxZ80elnnQdeWJuruDNtd8XM2cdwydAnnAQ1GFDMv8YjTfykxM1 U3xznwpLUBh2B0rqie1CYRLiAxe/lTZtzmmpU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=nRLB69IHLx1rSjDCKASE0Gstv9w+SnPx3+8buXB1JwydH2MjKP1O1U9QdAMxiCk5UI N1uyAuUI9SlWN1dlvBb31/CoH/GPWkICLv3v+p40KTuMaaI7TMAzkcSQHHLkAsnpctG2 6Jyh4puOrlwzABZlv+1HcTeUh60BRPCzx/NIY=
Received: by 10.216.179.133 with SMTP id h5mr775581wem.69.1300363315309; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-osl-vl300-64-103-53-109.cisco.com (dhcp-osl-vl300-64-103-53-109.cisco.com [64.103.53.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5sm1062704wes.33.2011.03.17.05.01.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Ole Troan <ichiroumakino@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <BF307AAD-2CFE-4EF4-936B-6AC70BD8853F@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:01:52 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CE1D4D92-4B34-47A4-8B71-2D62E162F47C@employees.org>
References: <BF307AAD-2CFE-4EF4-936B-6AC70BD8853F@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Tetsuya Murakami <tetsuya@ipinfusion.com>, Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>, Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for Prague?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:00:29 -0000

Ted, John,

> If you want to be on the agenda for Prague, please let me and John know.   I've gotten a couple of agenda requests already and am working on preparing an agenda.

we have a draft on 4rd (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-intarea-4rd-01)
that requires a new DHCPv6 option to provision CEs (very similar in idea to the DHCPv4 6rd option).

we have a fair idea of _what_ needs to be provisioned but less how the actual option would look like.
which do you prefer? that we present the idea to DHC now, even though it is half baked, or wait until we have something more concrete in the way of option format to discuss?

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email