[dhcwg] IPv6 prefix options for DHCPv6
" Pekka Pääkkönen " <Pekka.Paakkonen@vtt.fi> Thu, 15 August 2002 13:06 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24647 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id JAA28134 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:07:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA27794; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:01:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA24873 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:12:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from melanieb.vtt.fi (melanieb.vtt.fi [130.188.1.12]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA21707 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from elemail.ele.vtt.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by melanieb.vtt.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11629 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:11:56 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from ele4114 (ele4114.ele.vtt.fi [130.188.94.114]) by elemail.ele.vtt.fi (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA00719 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:11:54 +0300 (EET DST)
Message-ID: <032501c24455$32ff5b60$725ebc82@ele4114.ele.vtt.fi>
From: Pekka Pääkkönen <Pekka.Paakkonen@vtt.fi>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:13:43 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0322_01C2446E.57F3EC10"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
Subject: [dhcwg] IPv6 prefix options for DHCPv6
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Hi! I have a few questions about "IPv6 prefix options for DHCPv6" -draft. Has there been consensus about adding these options to the DHCPv6 protocol? Which kind of discussion took place at IETF 54 in Yokohama concerning this draft? Pekka
- [dhcwg] IPv6 prefix options for DHCPv6 Pekka Pääkkönen