Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-00

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 16 December 2011 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAC121F850E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GRL-Z7XKDK-c for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827C821F84DF for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTurc1LMHKfKYAMJhDH8QWLCpTFHSn+CR@postini.com; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:27 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF661B82B5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E01190052; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.134]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:53:22 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-00
Thread-Index: AQHMtpwjAljFLrkpaEuFQR2ym6HpQ5XV+CLAgAeUJQCAAHHWAA==
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:53:21 +0000
Message-ID: <741CB57E-F60F-49A4-8F2C-A888F45E1BD9@nominum.com>
References: <EBA5E737-027B-40F2-AE1D-A48A2051F441@nominum.com> <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890A199E5D@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com> <64188822-4E63-449C-B048-A4D6340252BD@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <64188822-4E63-449C-B048-A4D6340252BD@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_741CB57EF60F49A48F2CA888F45E1BD9nominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:53:29 -0000

On Dec 15, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
Pragmatically, there is interest in the SP and vendor community to move this option forward so the soon-to-be deployed IPv6-capable CE routers can mitigate issues with certain deployment scenarios.

Ralph, are you arguing that we should pass this on sooner than the date I originally proposed?   Given that we've had some review and that we generally don't get late review, and that this particular review is informal, I'm not entirely opposed to that, but please let me know if that's what you intended.