Re: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as wg work item
"David W. Hankins" <David_Hankins@isc.org> Fri, 26 January 2007 17:38 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAV1w-0007Hf-5M; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:38:28 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAV1u-0007Fp-8g for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:38:26 -0500
Received: from goliath.isc.org ([2001:4f8:3:bb::72]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAV1t-0000L5-J5 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:38:26 -0500
Received: by goliath.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10200) id AC31E5A6ED; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:38:21 -0800
From: "David W. Hankins" <David_Hankins@isc.org>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as wg work item
Message-ID: <20070126173821.GE3731@isc.org>
References: <45B9EA22.20506@uninett.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <45B9EA22.20506@uninett.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0850814114=="
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Stig Venaas wrote: > There was consensus at the dhc wg meeting in San Diego to adopt > draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as a dhc wg work item. For details > see the minutes at > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/minutes/dhc.txt > > If there are no objections posted to the wg mailing list, the > chairs will accept the draft as a wg work item on 2007-02-09. As I recall the consensus was to reform the document to move the (extensive) discussion of ISC's implementation into a stripped-down summary in an appendix (if retain it at all) and to expand upon the advice to draft authors. Consequently the draft probably won't be named 'atomic dhcp' after that. I am unsure if I'm going to be able to complete that prior to the IETF 68 cutoff date...very busy at our office here. -- David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time, Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again." Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
_______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as… Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-0… David W. Hankins
- RE: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-0… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-0… David W. Hankins
- Re: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-0… Stig Venaas