RE: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as wg work item

I recall the same. But, I also see no reason to allow the reworked draft
to be published as a DHC WG work item (rather than first as an
indidivual submission).

- Bernie 

-----Original Message-----
From: David W. Hankins [mailto:David_Hankins@isc.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 12:38 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adopting draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as wg work
item

On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Stig Venaas wrote:
> There was consensus at the dhc wg meeting in San Diego to adopt
> draft-dhankins-atomic-dhcp-00 as a dhc wg work item. For details
> see the minutes at
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/minutes/dhc.txt
> 
> If there are no objections posted to the wg mailing list, the
> chairs will accept the draft as a wg work item on 2007-02-09.

As I recall the consensus was to reform the document to move the
(extensive) discussion of ISC's implementation into a stripped-down
summary in an appendix (if retain it at all) and to expand upon
the advice to draft authors.

Consequently the draft probably won't be named 'atomic dhcp'
after that.

I am unsure if I'm going to be able to complete that prior to the
IETF 68 cutoff date...very busy at our office here.

-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.	-- Jack T. Hankins

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg