IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] more thoughts about draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Fri, 27 June 2014 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998B01B2CF5 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.803
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.803 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iT0mgZqbStTb for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC021B2B44 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s5RCPX4a060270; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201406271225.s5RCPX4a060270@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Sten Carlsen <stenc@s-carlsen.dk>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:13:35 +0200. <2F80E61F-10A9-4CC1-A0A4-1545E453766A@s-carlsen.dk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:25:33 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/9uvalLH_xf94WKVeP9349Ml-OKo
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] more thoughts about draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:25:46 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  > => synchronization allows to offer a smaller window.
> On the contrary. Synchronisation allows me(the attacker) to change
> the victim's time to suit my replay.

=> I don't follow you again. What is the victim (client or server)?
And BTW can you detail one attack example?

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email