RE: [dhcwg] Error codes for Decline message
"Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se> Mon, 21 January 2002 07:54 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA02331 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:54:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id CAA24335 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:54:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA24157; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:45:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA24131 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:45:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [208.237.135.240]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA02249 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 02:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mr6.exu.ericsson.se (mr6u3.ericy.com [208.237.135.123]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0L7jAh03688 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:45:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se (eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.37]) by mr6.exu.ericsson.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0L7jAf07686 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:45:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: FROM eamrcnt760.exu.ericsson.se BY eamrcnt747.exu.ericsson.se ; Mon Jan 21 01:45:09 2002 -0600
Received: by eamrcnt760.exu.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <ZQBK637A>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:45:09 -0600
Message-ID: <66F66129A77AD411B76200508B65AC69B4CDCB@EAMBUNT705>
From: "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>
To: 'Jim Bound' <seamus@bit-net.com>, Vijayabhaskar A K <vijayak@india.hp.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Error codes for Decline message
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:45:08 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1A24F.8C378750"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
I agree with Jim (we may want to add some additional error codes down the road). At one point in the discussions, we were about to abandon all error codes and simply have a success / failure indication. So, please think minimal error codes! I don't agree with Vijay's position that the two instances given are Decline cases. They should instead result in Releases (if a client doesn't want an address the server gave it, it should Release it). Also, other than for "logging", I don't believe the server really cares. Decline says to basically "Abandon" the address as it appears to be in use by a system already when it should not be. Release says just to release the addresses and place them back into the available pool of addresses. The status codes don't change the processing, IMHO. You don't even need to set them to specific values (the error codes are more for server to client communication in Reply's, IMHO). - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: Jim Bound [mailto:seamus@bit-net.com] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 8:30 PM To: Vijayabhaskar A K Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Error codes for Decline message Hi Vijay, Your ahead of us with hands on code for dhc6. And thanks for putting it in the public domain that was very nice. We are trying to get to PS. I suggest that we will find more needed error codes once we begin more implementations and more error codes. Right now I believe we have the generic onces to to resolve a response for all errors trying to extrapolate the possibilities from the spec without writing the code myself. So I think adding a new code before PS as you have found as bonifided implementor is good. But I caution the WG positively to not head down all these paths we will find many new pieces we need from more implementation and getting to PS is important so other folks are not implementing specs 3 revs behind as it has engineering cost and thats part of our job in the IETF is to keep that to a minimum in our work for the folks that write code. /jim On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Vijayabhaskar A K wrote: > We need error codes to be defined for Decline message. > AddrInUse - Address already in use. > Is there any other scenario for which the client can > send decline message? > Will the following scenarios contribute to decline message? > - The lease time the client has got is not sufficient for it. > - The client has asked for a prefix A. But the server's > admin policy says that for that client assign address > with prefix B and it does so. > I think, a mere release is not enough for these above > situations. This has to be notified to the admin to take > corrective action. > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Error codes for Decline message Vijayabhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Error codes for Decline message Jim Bound
- RE: [dhcwg] Error codes for Decline message Bernie Volz (EUD)