Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8415 (6269)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 03 September 2020 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56803A0ECE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZgrwhmHEUC_U for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738A93A0F47 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id d20so3391477qka.5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=X0SZHrVhzEODJUtnzMmwlO5g4z++XyObwBApuIQdLEE=; b=g3JzsMOZrt/8VBb6wieWR0/rFeckbIb6ODdKEhVpMnfOY8OHO/yFXcOG+Ys2IKl9Gq CmQiobmbxjcwG10W5QpxxFQabwud2IyTcx5BB6ZJV66NI0vEfhSNL43rfBK1WrbL15qV PTZEGbzVPuwwsZXtjULFZ1AMTdfAje93aKf/CNv6BQBjoDg8sq7sgm1SRXZ0kLYVxHVu ZcW0mPzVIIsm+iPMAw0lqPoiKj2/E7znvpZnnn4io9ywHG0xi42g4gV5J5j0GsQYK1/F iiSZZ+o2qSTuE3LYdF69YifFsHhZCMndlvEljbJVRPGQ0kE0cGcHp95TfCtId4YUaxYm CSGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=X0SZHrVhzEODJUtnzMmwlO5g4z++XyObwBApuIQdLEE=; b=CzZtZhKpVNvA4exhezzA/ZOmXlvdhOnHMkFAhOqLsWXUDv64kI79/uXcD6FAWV/63P lpd/pgJ1WhzamhTwIPQxwjHA+e3kYYm62d9tQpsq/5Rpp82FfDbYBKbUjxV0k9z+t5pn vSzfa8/C/PKkHwrjxxj3YDX+5v/syflT3mpUp3M/9nl10f784yB8+xKLnjPiu+jWJPEs EMaDLZblW1jXm2w8P18xQWrh0htyrYRLfoeZKdIvVFJjxxm8qPej0kQwdkvPAukwxBNH QNY4lP/ELRdrCGCGdX1jQO9gDH36tZemTjUF4VceB3DuiLH6hr2YE9g/9oVaWNWIczrU ymYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MKot6DKZBaAAk8LmHuOO3wzQ8/gtSDd1pDfuMROZVteQdt9+L Glu4d5K8BfrrnVO8j5DC3OF7kA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4nnXZlnTPngQ4g2KCKpf+sE+179FOl+ZYGRd8fSSBp8rnlzO83ifelxW4FAT5Pror1+nO3w==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a750:: with SMTP id q77mr3328841qke.377.1599146344464; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:18b:300:36ee:ec4d:8977:3c9a:2095]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm2212508qtt.39.2020.09.03.08.19.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <AF158680-0083-463B-9C52-141B17B5613C@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7D9FFA1B-C3CE-4FBE-B0A4-AC47DC1749DE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\))
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:19:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB254709039DF02A88173AA96CCF2C0@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com" <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, "msiodelski@gmail.com" <msiodelski@gmail.com>, "Andrew Yourtchenko (ayourtch)" <ayourtch@cisco.com>, "mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "jiangsheng@huawei.com" <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "ek.ietf@gmail.com" <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "tim@qacafe.com" <tim@qacafe.com>, "fhamme@united-internet.de" <fhamme@united-internet.de>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
References: <20200830154615.6CECEF4076B@rfc-editor.org> <BN7PR11MB2547CB85EBCF595FEE42A340CF510@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <6C4649AD-EB18-47E6-A5EA-440910977A26@fugue.com> <BN7PR11MB254709039DF02A88173AA96CCF2C0@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/FFAM28oqY1hwDUWoaTl3ycmZtO8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:20:14 -0700
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8415 (6269)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 15:19:17 -0000

On Sep 3, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> I really wonder how large an issue this is and how frequently Server Unicast is even used. Perhaps in retrospect, a feature we might have considered removing.

I’d be surprised if it’s used—it’s a knob you’d have to configure that doesn’t make things work better. IIRC we put it in because not everybody agreed that just requiring multicast always was a good move.