[dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05 - respond by Feb. 3

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 20 January 2014 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235971A0253 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6_PzrYgWE9p for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-x22f.google.com (mail-ee0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC481A0252 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id d49so2844367eek.6 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=So1d9Lmi9cl7zhPPzN+F8JJpmJ3iE3ISbzDuuPYvgGk=; b=wobh3uP+m2P9oZ8jUQNgK/pNvD1SxxCyzPqV6t9B1TN0Zid5faTm7hItdTIaoenws1 AfnhDVvCp22MVEI2enpQcKGpBXHV6pTDk+iTHMuSZd6nhMpIWEQVJQBzoagATQt5+UJe QCEiK4kKhARri7cBo++szLweklrwB1SmqVatTeaSAYP1SLvEPvbAaW0itecGNLXu8Zk0 wE5l/F4t67ut8RwT6fn8/0mMw5FgjMvquC6pHJOuFKh1/lBpLPRWaqZl4e0REF7DQV2l 9l2qZk5AzQxYsNikpopewPwijqZoFqvm+0xl9do651T25M9yMbzjDB1yqtjYvkh8EQvu 883Q==
X-Received: by with SMTP id s5mr19270223eeh.28.1390244718147; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. []) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o47sm6109109eem.21.2014. for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52DD7366.3000101@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:05:10 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE2B09C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE2B09C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20140120200510912
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ole_Tr=F8an?= <ot@cisco.com>, "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05 - respond by Feb. 3
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:05:20 -0000

On 20.01.2014 19:40, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> I request a WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05. There have
> been no comments since I posted it just about 3 weeks, so I assume all
> previous outstanding issues have been addressed sufficiently.

Since Bernie is co-author, I'll manage this work group last call on my
own. Authors believe that stateful-issues-05 draft is ready for WG last
call. Please post your comments no later than on February 3rd.

This is a second WGLC for this draft. The previous one was done almost
exactly a year ago (see Ted's mail from 2013-01-14). This work had a
good support back then, but the changes after it were sufficiently big
that another WGLC is warranted.

Please keep in mind that if you want this work to be published, you must
express your support. The fact that you used to support this work some
time ago is not sufficient.

A friendly reminder: If you have any technical improvements that you'd
like to see in DHCPv6, this is a good time to mention them. The on-going
3315bis work is mostly about doing minor corrections and clarifications,
so any bigger changes are more appropriate for stateful-issues.