IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-02.txt

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 06 January 2011 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC573A6E1E for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:38:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.528, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94nzUtuRulBu for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com (e9.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.139]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64063A6D3C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 06:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.85]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p06EGNKV009631 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:16:25 -0500
Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC0F4DE8043 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:36:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p06EdiTI163800 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:39:44 -0500
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p06EdhiQ032696 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:39:44 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-65-205-129.mts.ibm.com [9.65.205.129]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p06EdhwK032669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:39:43 -0500
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.12.5) with ESMTP id p06Edgwg022576 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:39:42 -0500
Message-Id: <201101061439.p06Edgwg022576@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <36A80113-2DF3-4D81-8490-D0FD91DFD2F9@nominum.com>
References: <36A80113-2DF3-4D81-8490-D0FD91DFD2F9@nominum.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> message dated "Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:32:34 -0500."
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:39:42 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:38:13 -0000

Hi all.

Now that the holiday break is over, some reviews of this document
would be appreciated. The WG won't advance it if there is only
silence...

It's a short document. Only about 3 pages of substance.

Thanks!

Thomas

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> writes:

> We've been asked to do a last call on this draft; the authors
> believe that it's ready, and at least one reviewer believes so too.
> Please take this opportunity to review the draft if you have not
> already done so.  If you find problems, please discuss them here on
> the mailing list.  If you favor advancing the draft, please say so.
> If you do not want the draft to advance, please say so.  If we hear
> nothing but dead silence, the draft will not advance.

> I will be offline from 12/30/10 to 1/10/10, so I will make some
> determination as to the consensus on this draft when I get back
> online on the 10th.

> Thanks!

> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email